Nice work. However there is a deprecated indicator on the OSGi Bundles item (under Eclipse Developer). What exactly do you mean with it?
As an OSGi developer I found it rather strange to see OSGi and deprecated on the same sentence. =o) Thanks, Rodrigo On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 6:04 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since the question of choosing an Eclipse Integration is often asked, I > just worked on the "Eclipse Integration" page from Maven Users Wiki: > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Eclipse+Integration > > I started a comparison matrix with basic project informations. > > This Wiki is public: feel free to improve the comparison. > > Selon Abel Muiño <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > As for the comparison between maven integration solutions, I know none > but it > > would be interesting if someone started one (like a google group and > some > > pages on it). Since I'm involved with q4e, it would not be a fair > comparison > > if I made it :-). > > > > I think it would be easy to have a "feature matrix" just if several > users of > > the different solutions exchanged opinions on a list. > > > > As for cleaning the project from the shell... if you use eclipse, you'll > > need to refresh/rebuild the workspace. This is not a problem with the > > plug-ins, but something that goes deep in the eclipse architecture. > > > > > > Rodrigo Madera wrote: > > > > > > Since you are on the topic, do you know if any of these have trouble > if > > > you > > > go to a shell and do a `mvn clean` on the project? > > > > > > I have a plugin (dont remember its name) that integrates Maven nicely, > but > > > is allergic to the (sometimes needed) cleaning. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Rodrigo > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 2:09 AM, Jason Chaffee < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> I found the following FAQ about Q4E: > > >> http://code.google.com/p/q4e/wiki/FAQ > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Features > > >> > > >> > > >> * running Maven goals from the IDE > > >> * dependency managing using the Maven POM, with automatic > download > > >> of dependencies > > >> * keeping Eclipse classpath synchronized with Maven POM > > >> * dependency graphing > > >> <http://code.google.com/p/q4e/wiki/DependencyGraphViewer> > > >> * direct import of Maven 2 projects > > >> * wizard for creation of new projects using the archetype > > >> mechanism > > >> * modular approach to improve reusability by other Eclipse > > >> projects > > >> * ability to import parent projects (pom projects) > > >> <http://code.google.com/p/q4e/wiki/ImportingMultiprojects> (from > 0.5.0) > > >> > > >> * ability to cancel maven builds (from 0.5.0) > > >> * dependency analysis tooling (from 0.5.0) > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> What are the differences between this plugin and m2eclipse (aka > Tycho)? > > >> > > >> > > >> The objective of this plugin is to be part of the Eclipse Foundation > > >> <http://www.eclipse.org> , for that reason the license is EPL and we > are > > >> going to follow the foundation procedures. Thanks to the sponsorship > of > > >> DevZuz <http://www.devzuz.com> , an Eclipse Strategic Developer > Member > > >> <http://www.eclipse.org/membership/showMember.php?member_id=824> we > are > > >> in a good position to achieve this goal. > > >> > > >> Besides the objective, there are technical differences. While > m2eclipse > > >> shows Maven output in a console, Q is based in events and will show > them > > >> in an organized way that allows filtering by severity, search,... > > >> Functionality like the dependency graph, or creation of new projects > > >> using the archetype mechanism are only present in Q. > > >> > > >> Also it's implemented in several modules with reusability and > extension > > >> in mind so other people can develop their own plugins taking > advantage > > >> of the functionality they need (see for instance Candy for Appfuse > > >> < > http://ramblingabout.wordpress.com/2007/09/02/candy-for-appfuse-will-be > > >> > > > -under-extreme-refactoring/< > http://ramblingabout.wordpress.com/2007/09/02/candy-for-appfuse-will-be-under-extreme-refactoring/ > >> > > >> ). > > >> > > >> In any case the underlying Maven libraries used for both plugins are > the > > >> same (the Maven Embedder) and both plugin developers collaborate in > its > > >> development. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris > > >> Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 5:45 PM > > >> To: [email protected] > > >> Subject: Mevenide vs. M2Eclipse, Q for Eclipse/IAM > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> I googled around to try to find a comparison between Mevenide and the > > >> > > >> alternatives, and didn't come up with much. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Can someone tell me the differences? > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> (I've spend some time with m2eclipse, and I'm *not* impressed). > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/amuino Abel Muiño Vizcaino - > > http://ramblingabout.wordpress.com http://ramblingabout.wordpress.com > > -- > > View this message in context: > > > > http://www.nabble.com/Mevenide-vs.-M2Eclipse%2C-Q-for-Eclipse-IAM-tp15659809s177p15662411.html > > Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
