Yup, i will do it tonite, if i have the karma on the wiki. Raphaël
2008/3/3, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Raphael, that was something I put together back in July before the > archetypeNG was done. Can you update the wiki with the correct info? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Raphaël Piéroni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 6:43 AM > To: Maven Users List > Subject: Re: when will maven 2.0.9 be officially released? > > > Hi Brett, > > the process for using archetype is no longer revelant. > > Regards, > > Raphaël > > 2008/3/2, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I agree with Wendy. > > > > You could also whip up a test case using these instructions: > > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Creating+a+Maven+Integration+Test > > as it'll give you a head start on being included in a release. > > > > > > - Brett > > > > > > On 03/03/2008, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Andrew Robinson > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > No, 2.0.7 and 2.0.8 both do not work with JDK 1.6 because of this bug. > > > > 2.1 fixed the problem. The earlier releases ran plugins and plugin > > > > executions in random order due to improper use of HashMap. > > > > > > > > It is really easy to reproduce the problem. I had 3 executions of > the > > > > maven SQL plugin and they ran out of order in JDK 1.6 and are fine > in > > > > 2.1. JDK 1.5 worked fine as well, so it definitely seems like it > was a > > > > collections use bug. > > > > > > > > Perhaps MNG-2784 was only a partial fix? > > > > > > > > > No idea, but it looks like all the related issues are closed. It's > > > likely nothing further will happen unless an issue gets reopened or a > > > new issue is raised. (It's also possible there's a technical reason > > > the fix for 2.1 can't be backported to 2.0.) > > > > > > Have you tried 2.0.9-SNAPSHOT? If you can't find an open issue that > > > describes the problem you're still having with 2.0.x, I'd open > > > another. Worst case, it might get closed as WONTFIX with an > > > explanation... > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Wendy > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Brett Porter > > Blog: http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >
