On 09/04/2008, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since you mentioned it, and I wasn't aware that there was a standalone > archiva, I decided to check it out. Firing it up with no config, just > adding an admin user uses up ~130MB of ram. A standalone default Nexus > config is using only ~28. Artifactory is using about ~50mb. On a server > this might not be important, but on a developer machine that could be > significant. In fact I never thought much about it, but we are running > the public nexus instance[1] that is hosting the proxy and repositories > for our two CI systems and the M2eclipse build, with the JDK default of > 64mb of ram.
Not really the right forum to debate such a thing, but I question your results since I run with -Xmx64m in the wrapper also, continuously on my macbook. It's true that the use of JSP and the default of Derby incurs some overhead which is why I expect that Archiva's figures are closer to that of Artifactory's. - Brett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
