I tested both plugins, and reported some issues to m2eclipse that have been fixed in 0.9.4. I just quickly tested q4e but features are *very* similar
I'm ok for competition, but as both plugins expect to get approved in eclipse foundation, I thing they must consider merging efforts for some core features. I can't thing there is many way to configure mavenEmbedder, configure Ide decorations and create an import wizard. In a perfect world, both plugin community should work to create a common basic plugin, and provide plugable enhancements as optional features. 2008/5/29 Rémy Sanlaville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > We are working to choose an eclipse plugin : Q4E vs m2eclipse > - The Eclipse IAM project proposal (based on Q4E) has been recently > approved by the Eclipse Foundation (cf. http://code.google.com/p/q4e/) > - m2eclipse has been recently reviewed (cf. > http://www.jroller.com/eu/entry/maven_integration_for_eclipse_project) but > we have no information if it is approved. Do you have some news about it ? > > If m2eclipse will also be approved, it won't be clear for eclipse user > which > one to choose. > Even if competition can be good, is there any chance to merge the effort in > one eclipse plugin ? > In fact, both of them have interesting features. > > Rémy >
