Great.  Thank you for the link.

After Brett's comments, I created a JIRA issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MODELLO-118

-Nate

On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 22:01:00 +0200, Hervé BOUTEMY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> see http://xircles.codehaus.org/projects/modello/lists
> 
> regards,
> 
> Hervé
> 
> Le vendredi 05 septembre 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
>> Which list would be more appropriate to post?  I have some more question
>> about how Modello is working, but I want to post to the correct list.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Nate
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 20:16:00 +1000, "Brett Porter"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> wrote:
>> > this is a bit OT for this list... but the reason it is occurring is
>>
>> because
>>
>> > it doesn't populate if it is the default value. Not sure if there's a
> way
>> > to
>> > force that (other than changing the default).
>> > - Brett
>> >
>> > 2008/9/5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> I have created a .mdo with a required int attribute of "count", and I
>> >
>> > built
>> >
>> >> with the goals "java" and "xpp3-writer".
>> >>
>> >> Here is the snippet from my .mdo file for the attribute.
>> >>
>> >>  <field xml.attribute="true">
>> >>   <version>1.0.0</version>
>> >>   <name>count</name>
>> >>   <required>true</required>
>> >>   <type>int</type>
>> >>  </field>
>> >>
>> >> The java objects are all created correctly; however, if I put a zero
>> >
>> > into
>> >
>> >> the count field, it is not outputted in the
>> >> XML.  It does output if I use a non-zero value.  I can see in the
>> >
>> > generated
>> >
>> >> file OutputXpp3Writer.java that it is checking for zero before it
> writes
>> >> the attribute.  I assume this is done to determine if a value has
> been
>> >> written into that field.
>> >>
>> >>  if ( tag.getCount() != 0 )
>> >>  {
>> >>    ... output attribute ...
>> >>  }
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Is there something else I should put in the .mdo to force this
> attribute
>> >
>> > to
>> >
>> >> write each time?  I have put in a temporary hack of making that
>> >
>> > attribute a
>> >
>> >> String and used Integer.toString(...) in my code, but I don't think
> this
>> >
>> > is
>> >
>> >> a good long term solution as the XML schema would be incorrect.  Is
>> >
>> > there a
>> >
>> >> better work around?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> -Nate
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> > --
>> > Brett Porter
>> > Blog: http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to