I did this. and if you do it, you will see no reference to surefire other than surefire in the reporting section.
thanks cl Josh Suereth wrote: > > Also to follow that up, > > Although you didn't specify the maven-surefire-plugin, your build file has > inherited it from the ethereal "maven super pom". > > Type mvn help:effective-pom to see what your pom *really* looks like, so > you > can get an idea of how/what to configure for surefire. > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Josh Suereth > <joshua.suer...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Lisa, >> >> >> The answer is that although Junit4 might support finding the @Test >> annotations, the maven surefire plugin (being backwards compatable, AND a >> completely different tool) looks for Test* *Test and *TestSuite. You >> need >> to configure the maven-surefire-plugin (This is the part of maven that >> calls >> into junit) for junit4 conventions, or you won't get your desired >> behavior. >> >> -Josh >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 6:39 PM, CheapLisa <l...@purpleblade.net> wrote: >> >>> >>> I do not believe this has anything to do with it and I don't understand >>> what >>> you are saying. >>> >>> L >>> >>> >>> >>> mgainty wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > place the groupId/artifactId/version in the dependencies in >>> > dependencyManagement Section of the parent pom >>> > <project> >>> > ... >>> > <dependencyManagement> >>> > <dependencies> >>> > <dependency> >>> > <groupId>group-a</groupId> >>> > <artifactId>artifact-a</artifactId> >>> > <version>1.0</version> >>> > >>> http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-dependency-mechanism.html >>> > >>> > hth >>> > Martin >>> > ______________________________________________ >>> > Disclaimer and confidentiality note >>> > Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relates to the official >>> > business of Sender. This transmission is of a confidential nature and >>> > Sender does not endorse distribution to any party other than intended >>> > recipient. Sender does not necessarily endorse content contained >>> within >>> > this transmission. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:44:45 -0800 >>> >> From: l...@purpleblade.net >>> >> To: users@maven.apache.org >>> >> Subject: Re: Is Maven / JUnit 4.x broken (annotations) >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> I looked at my effective pom. I have a dependency there on JUnit >>> 4.5. >>> >> The only reference to surefire was maven-surefire-reports-plugin in >>> the >>> >> reporting section. >>> >> >>> >> how do I know that surefire is using my dependency of JUnit 4.5? Is >>> >> maven >>> >> bundled with another version of JUnit and using an earlier version >>> that >>> >> I'm >>> >> not aware of? >>> >> >>> >> How do I force the surefire plugin to use JUnit 4.5? >>> >> >>> >> thanks >>> >> >>> >> L >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> John Stoneham wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> >>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:16 AM, CheapLisa >>> <l...@purpleblade.net> >>> >> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>>> I have JUnit 4.5 as a dependency in my maven pom >>> >> >>>> and I have imported annotations into my test case but >>> >> >>>> it is not recognizing the @Test and @Ignore annotations. >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> I still have to preface the method name with "test" >>> >> >>>> and the @Ignore tests get executed. >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> Is something broken? What do I need to do to get this >>> >> >>>> to work like expected and to take advantage of JUnit 4.x >>> >> >>>> which has over a year of release now. >>> >> > >>> >> > Hm. Last time this happened to me it was because I was trying to >>> >> > repackage JUnit with a bunch of other things, and it turned out >>> >> > surefire was inspecting my POM to look for a junit:junit >>> dependency, >>> >> > then pulling the version off that to determine whether to look for >>> >> > JUnit 4 tests. >>> >> > >>> >> > Sounds to me like surefire thinks your JUnit dependency is version >>> 3. >>> >> > We've got JUnit 4.4 configured here and it runs both 3- and 4-style >>> >> > tests properly. >>> >> > >>> >> > Is it possible to post the output of mvn help:effective-pom here? >>> >> > >>> >> > - John >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >>> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> View this message in context: >>> >> >>> http://www.nabble.com/Is-Maven---JUnit-4.x-broken-%28annotations%29-tp20929389p20943444.html >>> >> Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org >>> >> >>> > >>> > _________________________________________________________________ >>> > Send e-mail faster without improving your typing skills. >>> > >>> http://windowslive.com/Explore/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_speed_122008 >>> > >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://www.nabble.com/Is-Maven---JUnit-4.x-broken-%28annotations%29-tp20929389p20964992.html >>> Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org >>> >>> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-Maven---JUnit-4.x-broken-%28annotations%29-tp20929389p20987228.html Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
