> The issue to us was fairly simple: We had a working build 
> process. The developers knew the project. Everything was fine 
> and dandy. We moved to Maven and lost three weeks of work. 
> Developers don't understand the new process as well as the 
> old process, we've fallen behind schedule.

I am sorry it didn't work for you. All I can offer is what we did in our
environment that worked well.

We assigned one individual to research Maven and worked towards
Mavenizing our project. Everyone else continued working on features
using the ant process. So very little work was lost. Once a stable Maven
environment was acheived, the rest of the team was cut over. There of
course is a learning curve here but the rest of the team didn't need to
get it working, but rather they had to learn how the new environment
works. This saved a lot of frustion between developers.

Maven is now starting to spread like wildfire ;-).

At any rate, I don't think anyone should be trying to shove Maven down
your throat. It is good to share experiences and I am glad you have
shared yours. I hope it works out better for you in the future. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to