nicolas de loof-2 wrote:
>
> The convention is to use the reverse domain name you own.
> What is the groovy convention you mention ?
>
I will definitely use the reverse domain name as the Maven group ID. The
Groovy convention I'm referring to is to name user-visible packages
"groovy.xxx", and internal packages "org.codehaus.groovy.xxx". I'd like to
do something similar for Spock ("spock.xxx", "org.spockframework.xxx").
nicolas de loof-2 wrote:
>
> If groovy has other convention, feel free to package groovy.spock in
> org.spockframework : groovy-spock artifact.
>
Cool, thanks for the info!
Cheers,
Peter
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Peter Niederwieser
<[email protected]>wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm developing a language on top of Groovy and would eventually like to
> have
> it synced to repo1.maven.org. Now I've read that there is a requirement
> for
> all my package names to follow the reverse domain naming convention. But
> in
> my particular case, it would be much more sensible to follow Groovy's
> convention:
>
> org.spockframework.xxx for internal packages (I do own spockframework.org)
> spock.xxx for API packages (cf. groovy.xxx, scala.xxx, java.xxx;
> obviously,
> I can't ever own spock)
>
> Is this acceptable? Is this the right place to ask this question?
>
> Cheers,
> Peter
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Maven-Central-Repo-and-Java-Package-Names-tp22227066p22227066.html
> Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Maven-Central-Repo-and-Java-Package-Names-tp22227066p22228395.html
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
