All works fine, but you need to use version 2.4 of the deploy plugin.

Full working example is here:

http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/les.tgz

There's a plugin and a project that uses the plugin. Build/install the plugin, then "mvn clean deploy" the test project and you'll see it doesn't deploy.

On 26-Feb-09, at 7:59 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:

I _just_ saw a "maven.deploy.skip" property that the existing 2.4 deploy plugin will check. I'm perfectly fine with doing what you suggest Jason,
thanks very much for the recommendation (I don't care about the minor
inefficiency in this case).

But, that property can be set programmatically via another plugin?

Maybe something like the following?

/**
* @parameter expression="${project}"
*/
private MavenProject mavenProject;
...
public void execute() {
boolean shouldSkip = //determined in some way
if ( shouldSkip ) {
 final Properties projectProperties = mavenProject.getProperties();
 projectProperties.put( "maven.deploy.skip", Boolean.TRUE);
}
...
}

Will that work?

I'm not aware of when property binding occurs - i.e. if their values can be changed by plugins or if they're permanently set before the lifecycle starts
after reading the pom.

Thanks for any clarification - I think I'm close!

Les

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Jason van Zyl <[email protected]>wrote:

Not sure if this works in 2.x (it should, I know it works in 3.x) but I'll make an enforcer rule, or small plugin in the validate phase, which will
detect the changed. Based on the outcome set the skip deploy option
programmatically. Not the most efficient as the build will still happen but
the JAR will not get deployed and the build won't fail.


On 25-Feb-09, at 2:56 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:

Hi folks,

Here's what I'm trying to achieve:

I have a build that must run every 5 minutes or so in a Continuous
Integration server. It must do this because it downloads information that exists outside of a Maven artifact repository or any build environment and
must regularly check to see if information has changed.  If the
information
source has changed in any way, my Maven build must create a new SNAPSHOT
.jar to reflect the change.

If the information doesn't change, a new .jar should never be created or deployed to the repository. This is to avoid uploading a new snapshot
.jar
every 5 minutes to the repository, and consequently having developers all
download this snapshot as a dependency every time they build (yuck).

Is there a way to pre-emptively stop a build in order to prevent the .jar from being created/installed/deployed? I don't want to fail the build,
because this case is not a failure - the build would have correctly
stopped
short the lifecycle specifically because the .jar should not be created.

This behavior would exclude standard Maven profiles as a solution as I understand them because they're only activated based on some condition
when
the build starts. The knowledge of if a build should be 'short circuited'
would only be available after this plugin finished executing.

------
Now, here's my very specific use case of why I'd like to do this (but
should
probably work generically as described above), in case you're curious:

My plugin downloads .xsd files from well-known locations (not maven
repositories), auto-generates .java (and then .class) files representing these .xsd files, creates a .jar file and deploys this .jar to a maven repository. Other applications consume this 'Java XSD stubs' .jar to call web services and are quite happy, but they should automatically be updated if the .XSD contracts change, so they can eagerly adapt to these points of
change, in true Continuous Integration fashion.

But I only want the .jar to be created and deployed to the maven
repository
if one or more of the downloaded .xsd files are different compared to the
last time the build was executed.  If the files don't change between
5-minute cycles (verified by downloading them and comparing to the
previously retrieved files), nothing should happen

Everything is working except for the part where I pre-emptively exit the
build, but without Failing the build.

Anyone have any ideas?

Thanks SO much for feedback!

Cheers,

Les


Thanks,

Jason

----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder,  Apache Maven
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
----------------------------------------------------------

Simplex sigillum veri. (Simplicity is the seal of truth.)



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]



Thanks,

Jason

----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder,  Apache Maven
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
----------------------------------------------------------

You are never dedicated to something you have complete confidence in.
No one is fanatically shouting that the sun is going to rise tomorrow.
They know it is going to rise tomorrow. When people are fanatically
dedicated to political or religious faiths or any other kind of
dogmas or goals, it's always because these dogmas or
goals are in doubt.

  -- Robert Pirzig, Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to