Piotr, A trace of what works and what doesn't might be useful here.
Paul. On Dec 19, 2011, at 17:58, Piotr Isajew wrote: > Hi, > > About a month ago I started to have problems with one of > operators when sending via MM1 interface... They accept > m-send-reqs and properly respond with m-send-confs. > > The problem is that when message contains SMIL it isn't delivered > to the destination address. If I send plain text, or image > message (without SMIL) it's being delivered correctly. > > SMIL messages sent via other operators' MMSCs are handled > correctly. > > I suspect that the problem here is caused by a kind of software > upgrade/reconfiguration on the operator's side. I'm unable to > verify this with them however. It appears that their Customer > Care Department has been hired as a firewall between the > customer and the rest of the company. My most successful > conversation with them resulted in sending me configuration > messages for MMS service ;/ > > I've spent a lot of time experimenting with various combinations > of m-send-req and SMIL contents. It appears that whether the > message is being handled properly or not depends on SMIL > presence. > > Maybe someone had similar problems and would like to comment on > this? > > Response headers tell me that their current gateway is Comverse > 4.5 > > Regards, > > Piotr > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@mbuni.org > http://lists.mbuni.org/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@mbuni.org http://lists.mbuni.org/mailman/listinfo/users