Hi, just one "small" thing I faced while updating from 2.0.0M3 to 2.0.0M4:
In M3, there was a file "mina-core-2.0.0M3-sources.jar". In M4, such file is missing. It would be great to have such file again, or have two core files: one with classes only, and one with classes+sources, so that dev's don't have to link their IDE to the sources to get all javadoc etc. And later, in release version, just exchange the file with the classes-only-jar. Beside that: Except missing javadoc at many places, I had no deeper problems with MINA. Great library ... br, Alex On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:37:13 +0530, Ashish <[email protected]> wrote: > As we move towards defining road map for for MINA 3.0 release, wanted > to collect inputs from users. > > We want to know what are the problem/pain areas, that you as MINA > users, faced while implementation. > > To put it simply, what can we have in MINA in > implementation/architecture or whatever that could have made using > MINA easier and better. > > Your inputs shall be helpful in defining the 3.0 road map. > > For ex. Having some standard codec's would have helped > > -- > thanks > ashish > > Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog > > My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal -- It's not a bug. It's a feature!
