On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]> wrote: >> So, out of curiosity (I just browsed the docs and didn't find any >> info, it was a very quick browse!), in what ways is MINA 2 better than >> MINA 1? Maybe I'll do the switch! >> > > It's faster. It's easier to use (the thread model has been completely > reviewed). APR support and Serial protocols have been added. The API is more > consistent.
Well, it's all already developed and in the peak of concurrent users, I have less than 1% CPU usage, so I pretty much like it so far! > But if you don't need to switch, well, the best is to follow the common > sense rule : 'if it's not broken, don't try to fix it !" That's my philosophy too! :) Thanks for the response Andres
