We are already using mina 2.0 in production for more than 1.5 years ;)
Yes, there were some serious bugs at those early days (and I spent
several nights with profiler and my own monitoring tools :) )
but now I would say that 2.0 is stable enough!
Victor N
Ashish wrote:
2.0 is now in RC phase and soon we shall have a GA release. The API's
have been frozen, so no changes are expected.
We are working on killing the remaining bugs and go out with GA soon.
2.0 is not unstable :-)
thanks
ashish
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Michael Clifford <[email protected]> wrote:
I'm doing pretty well using the MINA 1.1 code base, but it looks like some of
the examples require the use of 2.0. I'm a bit worried about the note that
says that 2.0 is bleeding edge code though. How stable is it right now? Am I
likely to run into any problems using the 2.0 framework? As far as I know, I
don't need anything specific to 2.0 right now. However, I am trying to write a
client to go with my server, and the client examples appear to require 2.0. So
is it safe to use it? :-) Are any interfaces likely to change before release?
Are there any issues to be aware of at this point that would make it worth
sticking with 1.1 instead?
