Michael Clifford a écrit :
I'm doing pretty well using the MINA 1.1 code base, but it looks like some of
the examples require the use of 2.0. I'm a bit worried about the note that
says that 2.0 is bleeding edge code though.
That simply mean it's the code we are working on. There haven't been a
patch on MINA 1.1 for more than one year now (almost 2), and no release
too. I don't think there will be any in the next few years.
How stable is it right now?
Stable. No API modification, only bug releases.
Am I likely to run into any problems using the 2.0 framework?
It depends on which feature you use. For standard usage, it should work
just fine.
As far as I know, I don't need anything specific to 2.0 right now. However, I am trying to write a client to go with my server, and the client examples appear to require 2.0. So is it safe to use it? :-)
yes. But there is nothing you can do with MINA 2.0 you can't do with
MINA 1.1.7. You just have to convert the examples to MINA 1.1.7.
Are any interfaces likely to change before release?
NO (big no). API has been frozen.
Are there any issues to be aware of at this point that would make it worth
sticking with 1.1 instead?
Not that I know. Some majot bugs have been fixed since %INA 1.1.7, and
in any case, I would rather use MINA 2.0 than MINA 1.1.7.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.nextury.com
