Le 4/23/14 3:34 PM, Vladimir Kravets a écrit : >>> Yep, I know this, but first decoder will get data in the ByteBuffer not > in >>> the IoBuffer... Should I perform such transformation before decoder > will be >>> called? >> You have 2 decoders in the chain ? > Yep, first one performs encryption/decryption of the traffic in case if its > needed. > In both cases input is ByteBuffer.
Ok, I see. Here, you would like to have a way to get the decryted data stored in a cumulative buffer. Why don't you put the decrypted data into a IoBuffer then ? You will need to extend the IoBufferDecoder class instead of implementing a ProtocolDecoder. That will allow you to propagate a IoBuffer, and not a ByteBuffer. -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
