2014-04-23 17:40 GMT+03:00 Emmanuel Lécharny <[email protected]>: > Le 4/23/14 3:34 PM, Vladimir Kravets a écrit : > >>> Yep, I know this, but first decoder will get data in the ByteBuffer not > >>> in the IoBuffer... Should I perform such transformation before decoder > >>> will be called? > >> You have 2 decoders in the chain ? > > Yep, first one performs encryption/decryption of the traffic in case if > its > > needed. > > In both cases input is ByteBuffer. > > Ok, I see. Here, you would like to have a way to get the decryted data > stored in a cumulative buffer. >
Indeed > Why don't you put the decrypted data into a IoBuffer then ? You will > need to extend the IoBufferDecoder class instead of implementing a > ProtocolDecoder. > > That will allow you to propagate a IoBuffer, and not a ByteBuffer. Yes, it's a good idea. Thanks, I will try... Best Regards, Vladimir
