Michiel Meeuwissen wrote:
Ernst Bunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
that would be an excellent solution. but wouldn't it be logical to replace
the current imagemagick implementation with the java interface based one? of
corse there would have to be no compatibility issues..
ernst
Problem with that is that it makes life a lot more difficult since the java
interface based one is quite specific about the version of ImageMagick you
have. Otherwise it won't work.
--
Rico Jansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
"You call it untidy, I call it LRU ordered" -- Daniel Barlow
