I will do that from now on. I still have one more patch that needs
committing: MYFACES-6. When I submitted the issue, I submitted the
line of code to fix, but I noticed yesterday that it was never closed,
so I included the whole file. Since its part of the JSF API, package
structuring shouldn't be an issue.
Once this is committed, I should be working with the same codebase asa
you guys have.
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 09:48:43 +0100, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Heath,
> I just committed both of your patches.
> Kind request: Please submit future patches only for the latest CVS
> version. The patches still had net.sourceforge.myfaces as package.
>
> Manfred
>
>
>
>
> Heath Borders wrote:
> > I have removed this logic and am submitting a bug with the new code.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:31:24 -0600, Heath Borders
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Why does the PropertyResolverImpl have special logic for instances of
> >>UIComponent? There is nothing in the spec about this and the RI code
> >>doesn't do this either.
> >>
> >>This is causing problems for our code because we use a UIComponent as
> >>a data bean to hold presentation data. This bean is not bound to a
> >>tag, but is used in a ValueBinding to an attribute:
> >>"#{guiBean.titleComponent.value}". The PropertyResolverImpl never
> >>finds the value of the "value" property of the UIComponent because of
> >>special non-spec logic for UIComponents.
> >>
> >>What will happen if I take this logic out?
> >>
> >>--
> >>If you don't have a GMail account, I probably have 5 invites. Just ask!
> >>-Heath Borders-Wing
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
--
If you don't have a GMail account, I probably have 5 invites. Just ask!
-Heath Borders-Wing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
