We could be pro-active and implement support for it in x:commandLink before JSF 1.2.
Kalle > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Eric Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 12:33 PM > To: MyFaces Discussion > Subject: Re: Disabling a Commandlink > > If I remember correctly, I think they are going to add a "disabled" > attribute to h:commandLink and h:outputLink in JSF 1.2. I too > think this would be a good thing. I think I remember reading > this somewhere, but, you might want to double check me on > that... It might not hurt sending a message to the JSF 1.2 > list to see if this is indeed the case. > > Jon > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Korhonen, Kalle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "MyFaces Discussion" <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 2:18 PM > Subject: RE: Disabling a Commandlink > > > > What Heath suggested, definitely works well, but I can see value in > > supporting disabled attribute. It shouldn't be hard to > implement at all, > > in fact, you just have to do the same exact thing as below in the > > commandlink renderer rather than explicitly on page. Try it - I > > definitely would if I had a whole page worth of > commandlinks to change. > > > > Kalle > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Robert Breidecker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 9:17 AM > >> To: MyFaces Discussion; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Subject: Re: Disabling a Commandlink > >> > >> Excellent. I didn't follow your completely. Sorry. > >> :) > >> > >> --- Heath Borders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Yes, that's why I included the <h:outputText /> that has > the exact > >> > same text but is only rendered when the link is not. > >> > > >> > On Apr 8, 2005 11:04 AM, Robert Breidecker > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > I would still like to see the link (text only) on > >> > the > >> > > page. Woudln't using the rendered property hide > >> > the > >> > > link completely? > >> > > > >> > > --- Heath Borders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > > If you want that functionality why don't you > >> > just > >> > > > have the following? > >> > > > <h:commandLink value="#{myBean.myLinkText}" > >> > > > rendered="#{not > >> > > > myBean.linkDisabled}" action="Foo" /> <h:outputText > >> > > > value="#{myBean.myLinkText}" > >> > > > rendered="#{myBean.linkDisabled}" > >> > > > /> > >> > > > > >> > > > On Apr 8, 2005 10:46 AM, Robert Breidecker > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Does anyone besides me see value in having a > >> > > > disabled > >> > > > > attribute on commandlink and outputlink? When > >> disabled, the link > >> > > > > component will generate > >> > plain > >> > > > text > >> > > > > instead of an anchor tag. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > __________________________________ > >> > > > > Do you Yahoo!? > >> > > > > Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources > >> > > > site! > >> > > > > http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > -- > >> > > > -Heath Borders-Wing > >> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > __________________________________________________ > >> > > Do You Yahoo!? > >> > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > >> > protection around > >> > > http://mail.yahoo.com > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > -Heath Borders-Wing > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> __________________________________ > >> Do you Yahoo!? > >> Yahoo! Personals - Better first dates. More second dates. > >> http://personals.yahoo.com > >> > > >
