great idea as well! regards,
Martin On 6/3/05, Korhonen, Kalle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A good point there though. Instead of every single component having to > deal with PRETTY_HTML when rendering, the extensionsFilter (or another > filter) could (& should?) take care of prettying up the output. Much > more elegant solution and less coding for everybody, no? > > Kalle > > > ________________________________ > > From: Randahl Fink Isaksen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 8:30 AM > To: MyFaces Discussion > Subject: Re: org.apache.myfaces.PRETTY_HTML > > > I see your point, but I do not think this feature should be > removed, rather, it should be fixed so it works on all platforms. > > Of course we can all write our own servlet filter to do the > pretty printing - but why not make pretty printing a built in feature > for everyone to share? Pretty printing makes it easier for everyone to > debug the output with no need to use special software. Relying on a > pretty printing plugin for FireFox is not going to work for those > developers who deliver and debug solutions which are targeted for, say, > Internet Explorer. > > I noticed Daniel says it works for him - could it be a character > encoding problem? I generate UTF-8 and read the output using FireFox on > Windows XP. > > Any observations? > > Randahl > > > > > t have an impact on performance... > > Bruno > > > 2005/6/1, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I can confirm that it doesn't work for me > either. I found a sweet > plugin for Firefox though that basically does > this for you. (NOTE: > its a plugin not the default view source.) It > works pretty nice on > the tree2 examples (which are *definitely* not > pretty with all the > nested tables.) Too bad I didn't have it while > debugging the > renderer! > > We may want to consider removing this feature if > it doesn't > effectively do anything. I think making it work > would be a lot of > work ;-) > > sean > > > On 6/1/05, Daniel Zwink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > uh - shame on me and thanks to b0nyb0y! I've > only seen the JavaScript part > > and didn't realise that the HTML-part is in > one single line. > > > > > Have anyone else successfully configured > myfaces to > > > generate PRETTY_HTML output which shows up > nicely in > > > a browser's "View Source" tool? > > > > Me ;-). On my system (Windows XP, Tomcat > 5.5.9, MyFaces 1.0.9 M9) the > > generated html is relatively pretty (e.g. > there are line breaks between > > tags) with context parameter > "org.apache.myfaces.PRETTY_HTML" set to true > > (in web.xml). > > > > > > Daniel > > > > > > >
