Should MyFaces start a new taglib section for visual effects with use a taglib prefix of "e:" (or "d" for "dhtml effects")? That way, the base tags stay simple, the extensions extend tag functionality while remaining simple yet functional, the visual effects become optional whiz-bang web browser features, and any ajax-communicating components fill in a 4th library for those interested in components of that nature.
Any opinions on this proposal? Regards, David -----Original Message----- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Werner Punz Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 11:36 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Antwort: Re: ajax ajax ajax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > the effects are really fancy ... but I would not call the component a > ajax component ... more like a javascript enabled component. > thats because there is no real communication necessary back to the > server, unless the state of the "puff away" objects is also represented > on the server ... e.g. if you reload the page they are still gone. > > never the less it would be nice to have such a component :) > > only my two cents. > Yes the main problem is, that ajax basically originally only stood for javascript with xmlhttp and backend requests, it sort of becomes a replacement buzzword for dhtml components. So it is better to call the whole thing ajax instead of dhtml whatever.
