Be sure to do an update today because I noticed there has been a big
checkin of stuff last night.

Also when you checkout forrest, be sure to check out the trunk
(myfaces/forrest/trunk).

Good luck.

sean

On 7/8/05, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/8/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes we could use help porting these over (I did a few way back when.)
> > The component documentation should really go in the website so if you
> > could get up to speed with forrest that would be good.  Basically just
> > install forrest and setup a FORREST_HOME environment variable (follow
> > their instructions on that.)  Then you can checkout the
> > "myfaces/forrest" project from SVN and build.
> >
> > There is a sample component documentation that I setup
> > (component-template.xml.)  This is the preferred way to document
> > components.  Note that I setup a template for most compoonets a while
> > back (with just a bunch of to-dos.)  If you want to document one of
> > those, please just replace with the new component-template.xml format.
> >  The documentation for newspaperTable is representative of the new
> > format.
> 
> I use forrest for another project, and I already saw
> component-template.xml in forrest/content/xdocs/components (checked
> out along with current).
> 
> I'll see what I can do later tonight.
> 
> I wasn't sure if there were other reasons why that documentation
> shouldn't be ported (like maybe it was completely out of date.)
> 
> For anyone else who wants to help out on this, you also need to patch
> forrest/content/site.xml so that the new component page shows up in
> the index.
> Ie, just add a
> 
>          <component-name="component-name" href="component-name.html"/>
> 
> line in site.xml at the appropriate spot.
> 
> This is all very easy work if you want to contribute -- it's just
> time-consuming.
> 
> I'll open up a JIRA issue with directions copied from above and we can
> work on it in there.   Folks can comment in the issue when they start
> converting a page (or set of pages) so that we're not duplicating
> work.
>

Reply via email to