+1 It is many weeks ago for the last release and although there are no
major features added, many many bugs have been fixes and we have had a
great reorganization which is stable right now.

Bruno

2005/7/27, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> yes, I think that the nightly build files are signed. So really all we would
> have to do is declare them as RC-1 and put them up somewhere to get going.
> Well, and get 3 +1s, of course.
>  
>  with you and me, that makes 2 - another one out there wanting a new
> release?
>  
>  regards,
>  
>  Martin
> 
> 
> On 7/27/05, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > yes, that would be fine.
> > 
> > in apache term you must roll out an RC and wait for feedback from
> committers
> > and even users. We need three binding +1 (from committers)
> > 
> > also you have to sign the released files. I saw that Sean did 
> > something for that.
> > 
> > For MyFaces 1.0.9 I used PGP on my own box...
> > 
> > -Matthias
> > 
> > On 7/27/05, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
> > > Sounds cool...
> > >
> > >  another thing is that I have suggested releasing a 1.0.10 (or a 1.1) -
> > > there has not been much feedback though on this.
> > >
> > >  What's up, fellow committers, fancy a new release? 
> > >
> > >  regards,
> > >
> > >  Martin
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/27/05, Richard Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > MyFaces 1.0.9 jars are available at
> > > http://www.bluesunrise.com/maven/.
> > > > Those are what I've been using.  There was a short time where I did
> put
> > > > jars up on a private server for my dev team because of a couple of 
> > > > issues we were having with the released versions.  I was just hoping
> to
> > > > get something official setup.  If the question is hosting it, I can do
> > > > that.  Hell, I could probably even setup a script to do an svn update 
> > > > and push snapshots out.  I'll probably wind up doing that soon anyways
> > > > on a private server.  If there's enough interest I might as well go
> > > > ahead and make it public.
> > > >
> > > > Rich
> > > >
> > > > Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >We should ask James Mitchell.  He is a new committer to MyFaces (he's
> > > > >a longtime committer on Struts.)  He is constantly jabbering on and
> on 
> > > > >about Maven so he could probably answer that ;-)
> > > > >
> > > > >I'm not sure if a nightly build is warranted but I think we should
> > > > >have jars for the official release builds (starting with the 1.0.9
> > > > >which has already been released.)
> > > > >
> > > > >Let see what James has to say ...
> > > > >
> > > > >sean
> > > > >
> > > > >On 7/26/05, Richard Wallace < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>Any chance of getting a nightly snapshot in some maven repo
> somewhere
> > > > >>for those of us using maven in our projects? 
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Thanks,
> > > > >>Rich
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>I would suggest the nightly build as there have been many bug fixes
> > > > >>>since the release.  The timing of the next release is still up in
> the
> > > > >>>air but this project is in rapid change mode at the moment so IMO,
> you
> > > > >>>always want to be using the latest release even if its not yet 
> > > > >>>official.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>sean
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>On 7/26/05, Lindholm, Greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>>I'm going to start a project with MyFaces.
> > > > >>>>Should I use the 1.0.9 build or grab the latest nightly build?
> > > > >>>>Have a lot of bugs been fixed since the release?
> > > > >>>>Are we getting close to a new release?
> > > > >>>> 
> > > > >>>>Is MyFaces on a "Release soon Release often" strategy?
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>I don't mind updating often, what I really hate is fighting bugs
> that 
> > > > >>>>have already been fixed.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>What are people using?
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>Thanks
> > > > >>>> 
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> > 
> > 
> 
>

Reply via email to