Can you open this as an issue? regards,
Martin On 9/24/05, Andreas Schenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Montag, 12. September 2005 11:13 schrieb > [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > You can use this config in your web.xml, there should be no JavaScript... > > Thanks for your hint about how to suppress JavaScript output using context > parameters. This may work, but I still think, that MyFaces violates the JSF > specification: > > The method ViewTag.doAfterBody() (of the core view action) explicitely depends > on the HTML RenderKit -- at least for client side state saving. As far as I > understand chapter 9.4, this is a violation of the spec, or is it not? > > Chapter 9.4 states: "All JSF implementations must provide a tag library > containing core actions that are independent of a particular RenderKit." > > Using a RenderKit for some markup different from HTML, this code in the method > will not work. I don't know how much harm it does, though (yet). But I would > guess, that client side state saving should not work for a different > RenderKit. > > P.S. I am referring to the nightly built from 20050812. I don't know whether > the code has been changed in the meantime. > > Regards, > > Andreas Schenk > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Trainings in English and German
