Since the ordering is currently unspecified, and since 1.2 is a ways off for MyFaces, it seems to me that there's nothing stopping the MyFaces project from imposing our own ordering system on the loading process under JSF 1.1. And if it's demonstrated to be a good way of doing things, perhaps it'll influence the direction of JSF 1.2/2.0/etc.
I don't think we want to be renaming our jar files to "aaaaa-myfaces-tomahawk.jar" On 9/28/05, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cool! > > Yes, we do have a great expert group there ;) > > I don't fully understand the proposed solution, though. > > It will make sure that the jars are loaded in a certain order, and > that order will be the name of the jar-files. > > How are we able to change this with the proposed scheme? > > Or am I completely overlooking something obvious? > > regards, > > Martin > > On 9/28/05, Jesse Alexander (KBSA 21) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > too late for 1.2, I suppose! > > > > exactly the right time for 2.0... > > > > I think there is something like an issue tracker on dev.java.net. > > -----/Original Message----- > > > > Not really. Ed Burns has answered this: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > Yes, this problem is real, but we may be able to solve it in 1.2. As > > you may know, the webtier specs tend to ignore the config file ordering > > problem. In this case, we don't know the order in which the jar files > > containing the faces-config files will be encountered. > > > > I think I have a simple solution. > > > > I've filed it as > > <https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id > > =121> > > and will bring it to the EG. > > -----/Original Message----- > > > > I'd say: lightning fast response and in the best possible direction. > > > > kudos to the EG!!! > > > > regards > > Alexander > > > > > > > -- > > http://www.irian.at > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Trainings in English and German >
