+1 for that. I was never a big fan of the PRETTY_HTML and I never found it to work very well anyways.
sean On 10/25/05, Strittmatter, Stephan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On the other hand, when there is already such an ExtensionFilter in > jtidy (I also haven't known that), why spend efford to make pretty > output in myFaces? > > Why not removing the context parameter org.apache.myfaces.PRETTY_HTML > and create instead a short section in the wiki about jtidy as > ExtentionFilter? > > Just focusing on the main goal of MyFaces... > > Regards, > > Stephan > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jesse Alexander (KBSA 21) > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 2:05 PM > > To: MyFaces Discussion > > Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] PRETTY_HTML, was [RE: JFS's html output] > > > > -----Original Message----- > > I prefer to add a additional filter instead of doing this in the > > ExtensionFilter. > > > > jtidy has already a filter for this: > > > > http://jtidy.sourceforge.net/multiproject/jtidyservlet/filter.html > > -----/Original Message----- > > That's what I had hopes for (just no time to check ;-) > > > > thanks for checking it out > > > > regards > > Alexander > > >
