Cool has nothing to do with it. Examples are there to provide starting point for the technology and supposed to be running 'out of the box'. If I have problems getting examples for two consecutive releases to work, something tells me that risk of using this particular technology in real life is unacceptably high.
Like I said, it is just my personal opinion. Your mileage may vary. Igor -----Original Message----- From: Adam Winer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 10:14 PM To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: Re: JSF and Tiles Uh, so basically you're saying you never actually used it, but you can also claim it'll be a year before it's ready for a serious production app? Not cool... -- Adam On 3/26/06, Igor Marakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I haven't seen 1.1 version. Dropped the idea after not being able to get > examples for 1.0.6 and 1.0.7 to work. > > Igor > > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Winer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 11:53 AM > To: MyFaces Discussion > Subject: Re: JSF and Tiles > > On 3/25/06, Igor Marakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On the other hand, both Facelets and Shale/Clay are still too (IMO) > immature > > to become a basis for serious production app. Next year maybe... > > Have you used Facelets recently? In my opinion, Facelets 1.1 is > very much ready for prime time. And given my day job, I have > very high standards for "ready for prime time". > > If I were starting a new project today, I wouldn't consider using > JSPs (much less Tiles). > > -- Adam Winer > > >
