I don't see these as significant advantages to making it a separate JAR. None of these should be marked as required dependencies for standard tomahawk use - they should all be marked as "provided" scope, which avoids the issue.
I agreee. Why not include the facelets config file in the META-INF of the regular old tomahawk.jar? It certainly doesn't hurt anyone not using facelets and it would be a major incentive to use MyFaces components if they were able to be used with facelets out of the box.
-- Adam
Sean
