Not sure I understand why we'd want to skip 1.1.4 for Tomahawk. Last version was 1.1.3. Next version would be 1.1.4. It's a separate product so why skip a version?
On 9/20/06, Grant Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree. I vote let's just call it 1.1.5. On 9/20/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We no longer release Core and Tomahawk at the same svn revision level. > In theory, there are no dependencies between them so it shouldn't > matter. In practice, we keep finding little things we need to tweak > to make this the case. > > It's already a monstrous task to try to release a product (be it Core > or Tomahawk) without a critical flaw or regression. It'd be an > order of magnitude harder if we had to do so for both at the same time > (and our past releases for MyFaces Core+Tomahawk show that we never > hit the mark. > > There's no real reason why we have to release a new version of > Tomahawk just because we released Core, even though that's currently > our tradition (or vise-versa). > > At some point, we hope to stop releasing Core 1.1 -- no more bugs to > fix :-) -- but we will continue to release new versions of Tomahawk. > > > On 9/20/06, Jeff Bischoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Isn't that just taking 1.1.5 and renaming it 1.1.4? Won't that just add > > to the confusion? Clearly, it has confused me anyway! ;) > > > > Wendy Smoak wrote: > > > On 9/20/06, Jeff Bischoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> According to the release plan [1], the 1.1.4 Tomahawk branch will likely > > >> be abandoned in favor of 1.1.5... > > > > > > We're not skipping 1.1.4. The existing (very old) 1.1.4 branch will > > > be deleted, and we'll copy the 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT trunk to > > > tomahawk/branches/1_1_4. > -- Grant Smith
