Either way it doesn't make much difference. I just thought it would be simpler. Am I off base ?
On 9/20/06, Mike Kienenberger <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not sure I understand why we'd want to skip 1.1.4 for Tomahawk. Last
version was 1.1.3. Next version would be 1.1.4. It's a separate
product so why skip a version?
On 9/20/06, Grant Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree. I vote let's just call it 1.1.5.
>
>
> On 9/20/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We no longer release Core and Tomahawk at the same svn revision level.
> > In theory, there are no dependencies between them so it shouldn't
> > matter. In practice, we keep finding little things we need to tweak
> > to make this the case.
> >
> > It's already a monstrous task to try to release a product (be it Core
> > or Tomahawk) without a critical flaw or regression. It'd be an
> > order of magnitude harder if we had to do so for both at the same time
> > (and our past releases for MyFaces Core+Tomahawk show that we never
> > hit the mark.
> >
> > There's no real reason why we have to release a new version of
> > Tomahawk just because we released Core, even though that's currently
> > our tradition (or vise-versa).
> >
> > At some point, we hope to stop releasing Core 1.1 -- no more bugs to
> > fix :-) -- but we will continue to release new versions of Tomahawk.
> >
> >
> > On 9/20/06, Jeff Bischoff < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Isn't that just taking 1.1.5 and renaming it 1.1.4? Won't that just add
> > > to the confusion? Clearly, it has confused me anyway! ;)
> > >
> > > Wendy Smoak wrote:
> > > > On 9/20/06, Jeff Bischoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >> According to the release plan [1], the 1.1.4 Tomahawk branch will
> likely
> > > >> be abandoned in favor of 1.1.5...
> > > >
> > > > We're not skipping 1.1.4. The existing (very old) 1.1.4 branch will
> > > > be deleted, and we'll copy the 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT trunk to
> > > > tomahawk/branches/1_1_4.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Grant Smith
>
--
Grant Smith
