Can you add that as a comment to the issue?

Thanks,

regards,

Maritn

On 10/5/06, Marcus Christie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, I have tried a MyFaces portlet on GridSphere 2.2.X and that series has
a fix for this bug.  So I believe that this has been fixed in GridSphere and
is no longer an issue.

Marc


 On 10/5/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I went ahead and put it to resolved right now.
>
> thanks,
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 10/5/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Did you comment on the bug first?
> >
> > users can't close bugs, but one of the developers will eventually
> > close it out if you put a clear comment on it.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 10/4/06, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hey everyone,
> > >
> > > I'm new to the MyFaces list.  Most of my work at this point as been on
> > > the Trinidad incubator project.  As I am very familiar with portals
and
> > > was looking at making some enhancements to the Bridge Portlet in order
> > > to solve some issues with Trinidad, I decided to take a quick gander
at
> > > some of the MyFaces issues to see if I can help solve some of those
> > > issues as well.
> > >
> > > Issue Jira issue MYFACES-1358 is not a problem with the MyFaces Portal
> > > Bridge, rather it's an issue with the GridSphere Portal's
implementation
> > > of JSR-168.  The GridShphere portal does not return a valid namespace
> > > according to the JSR-168 API specification for
> > > RenderRequest.getNamespace() which clearly states:
> > >
> > > "The value returned by this method should be prefixed or appended to
> > > elements, such as JavaScript variables or function names, to ensure
they
> > > are unique in the context of the portal page."
> > >
> > > Apparently the GridSphere Portal returns a namespace that contains
> > > characters like "#"  which are not sufficient for this purpose.
> > > Namespaces need to be valid as both a prefix AND a suffix to element
> > > id's, javascript variables, and function names as defined by the W3C
and
> > > ECMA.
> > >
> > > What is the process for closing or returning this bug.  Is there one?
> > >
> > > Scott O'Bryan
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>




--

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Reply via email to