I agree that ajax4jsf is more elegant but if I just enable the filter for 
ajax4jsf, it fucks up my webpages; i.e. my tables...
If I enable the filter for ajaxanywhere instead, my webpages get rendered as 
expected...

So if there is no more compelling reasons not to use ajaxanywhere, I think I 
will look into it, at least for my current
project... :)


BTJ

On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 09:42:52 -0500
Jeff Bischoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Bjorn,
> 
> While they are similar in approach and capabilities, Ajax4jsf seems to 
> be the most common choice for JSF users today. While, AjaxAnywhere works 
> fine with JSF - indeed it was a common choice not too long ago - it is 
> written for JSP in general. Today we have ajax4jsf, which is designed 
> specifically for JSF. It just fits in nicer, I think.
> 
> Compare the following code snippets from thier example applications. 
> Which one do you think would integrate more naturally with a JSF app? I 
> chose ajax4jsf...
> 
> AjaxAnywhere
> ---------------------
> Current server-side time is :
> <aa:zone name="dateZone">
> <%=new java.util.Date()%>
> </aa:zone>
> <input type="button"
>         value="Refresh current server-side time"
>         onclick="ajaxAnywhere.getAJAX('?','dateZone')">
> ---------------------
> 
> Ajax4jsf
> ---------------------
> <h:outputText value="Type the Text:" />
> <h:inputText size="50" value="#{bean.text}">
>       <a4j:support event="onkeyup" reRender="repeater" />
> </h:inputText>
> 
> <h:outputText value="Text in the AJAX Response:" />
> <h:outputText id="repeater" value="#{bean.text}" />
> ---------------------
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Jeff Bischoff
> Kenneth L Kurz & Associates, Inc.
> 
> Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
> > Any specific reasons?
> > 
> > BTJ
> > 
> > On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 14:05:04 +0200
> > "Cagatay Civici" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> >> In my opinion, definitely ajax4jsf.
> >>
> >> On 11/2/06, Bjørn T Johansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Just wondering which one to choose...?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> BTJ
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> Bjørn T Johansen
> >>>
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> Someone wrote:
> >>> "I understand that if you play a Windows CD backwards you hear strange
> >>> Satanic messages"
> >>> To which someone replied:
> >>> "It's even worse than that; play it forwards and it installs Windows"
> >>>
> >>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> > 
> > 
> > 

Reply via email to