Jeff, I think, you are right. I was reading clause 3.1 and it seems restrctive to me but then clause 3.5 allows us to use for commercial purpose
Regards, Mike Jeff Bischoff wrote: > > Mike, > > Well ajax4jsf uses the CDDL [1], right? > > What part of the license agreement are you refering to? When I skimmed > over it, everything looked pretty standard. There didn't seem to be any > clauses that would restrict my use of ajax4jsf in the commercial > intranet application that I am developing. Did I miss something crucial? > > [1] http://www.opensource.org/licenses/cddl1.php > > Regards, > > Jeff Bischoff > Kenneth L Kurz & Associates, Inc. > > Mike Shaw wrote: >> I think Ajax4jsf has a more restrictive license agreement then >> AjaxAnywhere. >> >> I'm not sure, if we can use it for commercial purpose. >> >> Thanks >> Mike >> >> >> >> >> Bjørn T Johansen wrote: >>> Just wondering which one to choose...? >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> BTJ >>> >>> -- >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Bjørn T Johansen >>> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Someone wrote: >>> "I understand that if you play a Windows CD backwards you hear strange >>> Satanic messages" >>> To which someone replied: >>> "It's even worse than that; play it forwards and it installs Windows" >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >> > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Ajax4jsf-or-AjaxAnywhere--tf2559375.html#a7147645 Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
