For the taglib.xml files, jsf-comp has an autogeneration tool that builds the taglib files for you. The only drawback is that it only supports components (not validators for example). There is examples in the *-all.jar release.
You can get it here: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=137466&package_id=168411 it is the faceletsAntTasks 0.9 release that you are looking for. FYI - I haven't worked on it in quite a while, but it still should work fine with the new tomahawk releases. On 2/8/07, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I stand corrected. It's not there. Weird. I've realphabetized the sandbox taglib file and added subForm. On 2/8/07, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <tag> > <tag-name>subForm</tag-name> > <component> > <component-type>org.apache.myfaces.SubForm</component-type> > <renderer-type>org.apache.myfaces.SubForm</renderer-type> > </component> > </tag> > > > I'm pretty sure it's on the sandbox wiki because I think that's where > I got it, but I'll double-check. > > > On 2/8/07, Jeff Bischoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > speaking of which, does anybody have the correct taglib tag for > > s:subform? It's not on either wiki. :) > > > > Jeff Bischoff wrote: > > > That's true Mike, but here's where it gets dangerous. Those tag files > > > are being copied probably from one of the wikis. At best, they are > > > complete and accurate for the latest-and-greatest version, i.e. the trunk. > > > > > > Even if that's true, the user of a stable build is still tasked with > > > figuring out which components were added or promoted since his build and > > > altering the tag files to match. If this is not done, facelets does not > > > seem to complain but simply lets those components fail silently. I'm > > > going through this process today, as I've noticed some components are in > > > the wrong taglib file. (e.g. s:selectItems) > > > > > > So yes, because the project is volunteer, nothing will get done until > > > somebody decides to do it. But I think that if someone did choose to > > > tackle this task, their efforts would be quite worthwhile. These things > > > (taglibs, tag handlers, etc) really do belong in the jar itself. > > > > > > I'm not complaining that nobody has done it yet, just pointing out that > > > I feel it is worth doing. :) > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Jeff Bischoff > > > Kenneth L Kurz & Associates, Inc. > > > > > > Mike Kienenberger wrote: > > >> The ease-of-use is part of the problem. :-) > > >> > > >> When it only takes 5 minutes to copy the sandbox and tomahawk tag > > >> files to your application, and then another 10 to download > > >> t:updateActionListener, it's really hard to justify spending a week > > >> trying to figure out how to integrate automatic file generation > > >> support into MyFaces in a volunteer-driven project. > > >> > > >> On 2/7/07, Jeff Bischoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> Thanks for responding guys. > > >>> > > >>> Really, no official facelets support? That would explain the taglib.xml > > >>> not being bundled. I had wondered about that too. :) > > >>> > > >>> Having been on this mailing list for quite a while, I can tell that many > > >>> other users do use facelets with myfaces and tomahawk - which is the big > > >>> reason why I'm comfortable converting my application to facelets. It > > >>> does involve a few extra steps, and a few things don't work as expected, > > >>> but overall it's not a big switch from the user standpoint. > > >>> > > >>> Well thanks for the code, it does seem to work nicely. > > >>> > > >>> Regards, > > >>> > > >>> Jeff Bischoff > > >>> Kenneth L Kurz & Associates, Inc. > > >>> > > >>> Andrew Robinson wrote: > > >>> > I tried to get MyFaces to support Facelets a while ago, but I think > > >>> > the result was something along the line of no tomahawk developers want > > >>> > to bother. So, not being a MyFaces developer and not having the > > >>> > patience to wait for others to help and me not knowing enough about > > >>> > the auto-generation and other aspects of the build process that would > > >>> > affect this, I decided to make the jsf-comp version which was very > > >>> > easy to get out fast. > > >>> > > > >>> > We can hope for a kind volunteer of the MyFaces developer team to > > >>> > champion facelets support, but until then I guess this will do. > > >>> > > > >>> > FYI - I am not trying to put down anyone on the MyFaces team > > >>> > > > >>> > On 2/7/07, Jeff Bischoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> >> Hey this tag handler works great! > > >>> >> > > >>> >> ...So why hasn't it been donated to Tomahawk? :) > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Or is Tomahawk not supposed to have tag handler classes for some > > >>> reason? > > >>> >> Andrew? Mike? :) > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Thanks for writing it! > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Regards, > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Jeff Bischoff > > >>> >> Kenneth L Kurz & Associates, Inc. > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > >>> >> > Thomas, > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > check [1] for more on it (search for updateActionListener), > > >>> since you > > >>> >> > need a *taghandler* > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > -M > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > [1]http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Use_Facelets_with_Tomahawk > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > On 2/2/07, Thomas Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> >> >> Hi Aleksandr, > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> You are right. I do use Facelets. But I can use other t-tags > > >>> such as > > >>> >> >> <t:commandLink/> <t:selectOneMenu/> etc. in xHtml and they work > > >>> well. > > >>> >> >> Besides, I have the followings on the top of my files. > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> Thanks > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> Thomas > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; > > >>> >> >> xmlns:ui="http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets"; > > >>> >> >> xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html"; > > >>> >> >> xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core"; > > >>> >> >> xmlns:t="http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk";> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> Aleksandr Mazur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> Hi Thomas, > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> As I see you are using faceletes. updateActionListener should be > > >>> >> >> presented in tomahawk.taglib.xml. Is it? > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> Best regards, > > >>> >> >> Aleksandr > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> Thomas Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>> >> >> 02.02.2007 12:14 > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> Please respond to > > >>> >> >> "MyFaces Discussion" <[email protected]> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> To MyFaces Discussion <[email protected]> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> cc > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> Subject Error by using <t:updateActionListener/> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> Hi all, > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> My code look as follow: > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> myPage.xHtml > > >>> >> >> *************** > > >>> >> >> ... > > >>> >> >> <t:commandLink > > >>> >> >> action="openNewBrowser" > > >>> >> >> immediate="true" > > >>> >> >> value="Open New Browser" > > >>> >> >> target="readMessageWindow"> > > >>> >> >> <t:updateActionListener property="property" > > >>> >> >> value="message"></t:updateActionListener> > > >>> >> >> </t:commandLink> > > >>> >> >> ... > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> But I get following error when try to open myPage.xHtml. What's > > >>> >> wrong? > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> <t:updateActionListener> Tag Library supports namespace: > > >>> >> >> http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk, but no tag was defined for > > >>> name: > > >>> >> >> updateActionListener > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> Thanks > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> Thomas > > >>> >> >> ________________________________ > > >>> >> > Yahoo! 360° – Bloggen und Leute treffen. Erstellen Sie jetzt Ihre > > >>> >> > eigene Seite – kostenlos!. > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> ________________________________ > > >>> >> > Yahoo! Messenger - kostenlos* mit Familie und Freunden von PC > > >>> zu PC > > >>> >> > telefonieren . > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
