seems that mileage really varies

We have heard from projects that they never would have made
it in time without JSF given their scarce resources.

Thinking about the bad maintainability of System.out. webapps
I am HAPPY using JSF. Wouldn't want to go back to those old times.

And using Facelets even the "component"-writing is really fun.

regards
Alexander 

-----Original Message-----
From: taylan saldiray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 2:25 PM
To: MyFaces Discussion; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New to MyFaces

Iordanov, Borislav (GIC) ++

i have worked 6 months on jsf and given it up and wrote my html code
direct into the servlet. the reason is: the whole control is under my
hand, the rendered code is much simplier, works faster, consumes less
space and is more flexible.
we have spent one week for binding a table to a model and making it
editable and ajax-able wihch took too much time. and when an exception
occured, it was hard to detect the reason. one more thing which i
disliked about about jsf was a big bug which was solved in newer
versions but took much time for us and delayed the project. the reason
was a simple synchronization problem where multiple threads accessed
an object without synch.

On 4/6/07, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Iordanov, Borislav (GIC) schrieb:
> > I'm not sure what "statistics" you are looking for. I haven't done
an
> > industry analysis. But in general, JSF is heavyweight machinery
without
> > any substantial benefit. Simple things are complicated and
complicated
> > things impossible. It was obviously designed by (probably smart,
Java
> > knowledgeable) people that have no serious experience with web
> > development. A well-known example is that it still doesn't work well
> > with JSP (a technology for which JSF was designed from the start!)
and
> > it probably never will.
> >
> >
>
> JSF 1.2 does (myfaces soon will have jsf 1.2 level)
> and facelets basically do what jsp does. You basically
> speak about the mixin problems of html and jsf (verbatim tags)
>
> this problem is gone in the jsf 1.2 spec, and in facelets, facelets
also
> eliminates problems introduced by jsp...
>
>

Reply via email to