setting up a new sub project for an implementation of JSR-301 is definitely a good idea. I think we should start a discussion at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 6/7/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So... What are the next steps for this? Much debate and voting? :) Scott Scott O'Bryan wrote: > I'm totally cool with that and I'm pretty sure the EG would be fine > with that as well. We just can't do things the same way as we did the > old bridge. > > Also, JSR-301 has 1.2 as it's minimum Faces version, so I imagine this > could become the bridge implementation for MyFaces' 1.2 implementation > since I'm not sure much work was done with the existing bridge on it. > > I believe Stan Silvert would also be interested in working on this as > well. He's currently on the 301 EG as well and wrote the existing > MyFaces bridge. > > Scott > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >> Well, >> >> things like tomahawk, tobago and trinidad are also able to run w/o >> MyFaces core. >> So why not making the bridge an own subproject? >> >> -M >> >> On 6/7/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> That's certainly an option except that the Bridge in MyFaces is >>> distributed with MyFaces project. Right now the work that I have time >>> for will be needed for an R.I. This means it'll need to be able to be >>> distributed independently. That being said, I'm all ok with getting it >>> developed as part of MyFaces... >>> >>> Scott >>> >>> Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >>> > Scott, >>> > >>> > since we have already a protlet bridge here in MyFaces, why not >>> making >>> > it a "301 bridge"? >>> > >>> > -Matthias >>> > >>> > On 6/6/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >> Hey Martin, >>> >> >>> >> I am sort of scanning the list but the past few weeks have been >>> spotty. >>> >> I'll post back to the list. :) To answer your question, >>> documentation >>> >> is totally not there since most of the work I did for Trinidad was >>> >> running only in a "Proof of Concept" environment similar to the >>> bridge >>> >> that will be provided for JSR-301. I don't think this work >>> currently >>> >> works with the existing MyFaces bridge. >>> >> >>> >> In this proof-of-concept, trinidad works with the following >>> limitations: >>> >> >>> >> 1. Some of the popup support does not work. I had a JIRA ticket >>> on this >>> >> when Trinidad was in incubator but I haven't checked to see if it's >>> >> still there. I'll check it out. >>> >> 2. The javascript libraries are not namespaced meaning two trinidad >>> >> portlets on the screen at the same time may conflict. Again, I >>> had a >>> >> JIRA ticket on this and I'll check the current status. >>> >> 3. PPR in Trinidad has been disabled in a portal environment. >>> Things >>> >> that would normally do a ppr, will do a full-page submit instead >>> >> >>> >> Other then that, everything including FileUploads should work. >>> >> >>> >> Now I notices in the past month or so there has been much >>> interest in >>> >> fully supporting Trinidad in a Portlet environment. It's almost >>> there >>> >> but the biggest hurdle we have is the lack of a JSR-301 compliant >>> bridge >>> >> (or something that comes close). Some of the preliminary drafts >>> of the >>> >> spec have been released, but the Project is still looking for a >>> home to >>> >> host its R.I. Is this something people would be interrested in >>> doing as >>> >> part of MyFaces or the Bridges project? If so, how do we start the >>> >> process? >>> >> >>> >> Scott O'Bryan >>> >> >>> >> Martin Marinschek wrote: >>> >> > Hi Scott, >>> >> > >>> >> > a while ago, I sent the inlined mail to the MyFaces user list - >>> I'm >>> >> > sending it to you personally now, as I thought that maybe you >>> are not >>> >> > scanning the list, and therefore missed it. I don't want to >>> bother you >>> >> > too much - but even a small pointer to any documentation on >>> this would >>> >> > be very helpful... >>> >> > >>> >> > regards, >>> >> > >>> >> > Martin >>> >> > >>> >> > ------------- >>> >> > >>> >> > Hi *, >>> >> > >>> >> > I have skimmed through the online documentation for Trinidad, but >>> >> > haven't found anything useful about portlet compatibility. Is >>> there >>> >> > anyone in the Trinidad team who knows more about using portlets >>> with >>> >> > Trinidad, and can provide a link to more information? >>> >> > >>> >> > Especially I would be interested in: >>> >> > >>> >> > - file-upload - how's that handled in portlets? >>> >> > - including the script/style-elements in the header of the page >>> >> > (obviously, tr:document won't help in a portlet environment, >>> right?) >>> >> > - serving out resources with the resources servlet/filter (it's >>> clear >>> >> > that neither one will work in a portlet environment) >>> >> > >>> >> > I've heard about some jsf-portlet-bridge helping out here, but >>> that's >>> >> > RI, right? >>> >> > >>> >> > regards, >>> >> > >>> >> > Martin >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >> >> > >
-- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
