It is probably that the next major version of tomahawk (the one explicitly created for jsf 1.2) will integrate the facelets taglib generation in the build process, as it will take advantage of the code generation of the trinidad's maven-faces-plugin.
In the meanwhile, I use this library (implemented by myself): http://people.apache.org/~baranda/tomahawk-facelets-1.0.jar Feel free to use it, apache license... Cheers, Bruno On 31/07/07, Jesse Alexander (KSFD 121) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > instead of supplying two taglib-files... just create two jar-files with > nothing more in it, than > the two taglib files... > Then the deployment of the two jar-files is enough, whereas the deployment > of the two taglib-files > requires additional work from the user... > > regards > Alexander > > ________________________________ > From: Wolf Benz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 11:56 AM > To: MyFaces Discussion > Subject: Re: [Tomahawk] facelets > > > I talked about this with Werner Punz... > I thought: why not putting this file right away in the meta-inf of the > Tomahawk jar? > Won't harm nobody but will certainly help a lot of people. > Although I still subscribe to that idea, he had a point also: > > MF and facelets are indeed 2 different technologies, better keep the 2 > apart. > > > Yet, it's another thing we can';tr forget to set up and currently the file > @MF Wiki is indeed to be stitched together manually with is kinda funny > (unprofessional). > I think there is room for improvement, either in the form of a > facelets-integrated download. (so Toma & Sandbox WITH the taglibs in their > meta-in dirs) or at least another entry in the download table just for > facelets: a link to the jsf-facelts.jar, and 2 links, to the respective > taglib files. > This, for me, would seem to be its logical place. > > > -Wolf > > > > > > On 7/31/07, Erlend Hamnaberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > does anyone have an updated tomahawk.taglib.xml ? The one at the wiki > > does not seem updated. > > > > Will Myfaces add full facelets support to its custom components? > > > > Regards > > > > Erlend > > > >
