I've filed:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-142
against at least one of the doc problems with navigationPane.
I think that you can mix static items with the model, but
only either prepending or appending (and I don't think it's
doc'd which happens), so not exactly the solution you're looking
for. Though you could have:
tr:navigationPane
tr:commandNavigationItem
tr:forEach
tr:commandNavigationItem
tr:commandNavigationItem
-- Adam
On 8/6/07, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see that the navigation pane does, but the documentation is very
> light on the navigation pane. The demo only shows one level of
> tr:commandNavigationItem, and I couldn't find any information on it
> supporting nesting. Also, can you mix the model an
> tr:commandNavigationItem?
>
> What I am looking to do:
>
> menu
> static
> static
> static (*)
> static child
> dynamic children
> static
>
> In tomahawk the asterisked node looked like:
> <t:commandNavigation2
> value="#{messages.MenuBean_calendars}"
> actionListener="#{menuBean.onMainAction}"
> action="mainMenu_calendars">
> <t:commandNavigation2
> value="#{messages.MenuBean_createCalendar}"
> actionListener="#{menuBean.onMainAction}"
> action="mainMenu_createCalendar"
> rendered="#{s:hasRole('calendar-admin')}" />
> <t:navigationMenuItems value="#{mainMenuCalendarItems}" />
> </t:commandNavigation2>
>
> Where there is a hard-coded menu for calendar administrators and then
> a list of all the calendars for the current user below that but under
> a parent "Calendars" menu. Result:
>
> Calendars
> Create new calendar
> Main calendar
> Other calendar
> Etc.
>
> -Andrew
>
>
> On 8/6/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/6/07, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I am having a look at the Trinidad and Tomahawk code and trying to see
> > > if I can get the tomahawk controls to use the Trinidad PPR
> > > functionality so I can mix Trinidad and Tomahawk controls.
> > >
> > > The control I was looking first at was t:panelNavigation2 and
> > > t:commandNavigation2. I prefer their implementation over the trinidad
> > > functionality as it allows the menus to be more flexible (it allows
> > > for backing bean menus as well as items defined in the view).
> >
> > Trinidad allows this too with its navigationPane, which can
> > take a model value.
> >
> > -- Adam
> >
> >
> > >
> > > t:commandNavigation2 creates a submitForm call in the on click:
> > >
> > > submitForm('_id4',1,{source:'_id7:_id9'});return false;
> > >
> > > If I am able to reproduce this functionality using Trinidad's JS code
> > > then I can get them to work together. The challenge is that, on the
> > > client at least, the JS is obfuscated and not formatted, making it
> > > very hard to read. Has anyone attempted to replace this functionality
> > > with trinidad code?
> > >
> >
>
