Thanks,
It doesn't look like the navigationPane supports nesting either. I
tried, but only the top level nodes were rendered
tr:navigationPane
tr:commandNavigationItem (rendered)
tr:commandNavigationItem (was not rendered)
This would be great to support, or have navigationTree support
children of type "tr:commandNavigationItem" instead of just using
model. (basically support the same functionality as that of tomahawk).
On 8/6/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've filed:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-142
>
> against at least one of the doc problems with navigationPane.
> I think that you can mix static items with the model, but
> only either prepending or appending (and I don't think it's
> doc'd which happens), so not exactly the solution you're looking
> for. Though you could have:
>
> tr:navigationPane
> tr:commandNavigationItem
> tr:forEach
> tr:commandNavigationItem
> tr:commandNavigationItem
>
> -- Adam
>
>
> On 8/6/07, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I see that the navigation pane does, but the documentation is very
> > light on the navigation pane. The demo only shows one level of
> > tr:commandNavigationItem, and I couldn't find any information on it
> > supporting nesting. Also, can you mix the model an
> > tr:commandNavigationItem?
> >
> > What I am looking to do:
> >
> > menu
> > static
> > static
> > static (*)
> > static child
> > dynamic children
> > static
> >
> > In tomahawk the asterisked node looked like:
> > <t:commandNavigation2
> > value="#{messages.MenuBean_calendars}"
> > actionListener="#{menuBean.onMainAction}"
> > action="mainMenu_calendars">
> > <t:commandNavigation2
> > value="#{messages.MenuBean_createCalendar}"
> > actionListener="#{menuBean.onMainAction}"
> > action="mainMenu_createCalendar"
> > rendered="#{s:hasRole('calendar-admin')}" />
> > <t:navigationMenuItems value="#{mainMenuCalendarItems}" />
> > </t:commandNavigation2>
> >
> > Where there is a hard-coded menu for calendar administrators and then
> > a list of all the calendars for the current user below that but under
> > a parent "Calendars" menu. Result:
> >
> > Calendars
> > Create new calendar
> > Main calendar
> > Other calendar
> > Etc.
> >
> > -Andrew
> >
> >
> > On 8/6/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 8/6/07, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I am having a look at the Trinidad and Tomahawk code and trying to see
> > > > if I can get the tomahawk controls to use the Trinidad PPR
> > > > functionality so I can mix Trinidad and Tomahawk controls.
> > > >
> > > > The control I was looking first at was t:panelNavigation2 and
> > > > t:commandNavigation2. I prefer their implementation over the trinidad
> > > > functionality as it allows the menus to be more flexible (it allows
> > > > for backing bean menus as well as items defined in the view).
> > >
> > > Trinidad allows this too with its navigationPane, which can
> > > take a model value.
> > >
> > > -- Adam
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > t:commandNavigation2 creates a submitForm call in the on click:
> > > >
> > > > submitForm('_id4',1,{source:'_id7:_id9'});return false;
> > > >
> > > > If I am able to reproduce this functionality using Trinidad's JS code
> > > > then I can get them to work together. The challenge is that, on the
> > > > client at least, the JS is obfuscated and not formatted, making it
> > > > very hard to read. Has anyone attempted to replace this functionality
> > > > with trinidad code?
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
