Nah, I mean if Nate was to use it. In your case, Andrew, you might be able to remove it with MSIE 15 in 2030. On the bright side, I don't know its validity, but you can use http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp to comfort yourself.
Regards, ~ Simon On 8/23/07, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why would I want to remove it when IE6 disappears? I made this hack as > it is a bug/shortcoming in IE7. > > Just goes to show you that IE, regardless of version, is just a piece > of junk, but unfortunately has the market share. Well, that is a > rabbit trail... > > -Andrew > > On 8/23/07, Simon Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That's a nice hack too imho as you can easily remove it once IE 6 > > disappears. And yeah it would also work for trh:head renderer. > > > > > > On 8/23/07, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Probably, I am just using tr:document, so that is what I customized. > > > 1.0.2 is working fine with PPR on firefox 2.0 and IE7 for me. I only > > > implemented the "hack" as I also wanted quirks mode "functionality" > > > for IE since IE7 has bugs/shortcomings with height percentage > > > allocations in standards mode. > > > > > > -Andrew > > > > > > On 8/23/07, Perkins, Nate-P63196 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > Can this only be done on the tr:document? Doesn't the trh:head also > > > > produce a doc-type? Currently we use trh:head, trh:html, and > trh:body. > > > > What is the difference? > > > > > > > > Also, I would still think that the PPR should work regardless of how > or > > > > where or what I set the doc-type to. > > > > > > > >
