Can this be expected in 1.0.3? 

Nate Perkins
480-441-3667
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

>This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
may contain GDC4S
> confidential or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution
> is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact
the sender by reply email and
> destroy all copies of the original message.
>

-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Winer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 8:00 PM
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: [Trinidad] Upgrading to 1.0.2

I'm getting the feeling that we really need to add a flag
to at least trh:html or both trh:html and tr:document
that supports forcing quirks mode.

Thoughts?

-- Adam


On 8/23/07, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can use IE6 in quirks mode and firefox in standards mode by
> subclassing the tr:document renderer.
>
> If a comment appears before the doc type, IE will not go into
standards mode.
>
> Here is some code if you want to do it this way to force only IE into
> quirks mode while using tr:document:
>
> public class DocumentRenderer
>   extends
>
org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.renderkit.core.xhtml.DocumentRendere
r
> {
>
>   /**
>    *
>    */
>   public DocumentRenderer()
>   {}
>
>   /**
>    * @param type
>    */
>   public DocumentRenderer(Type type)
>   {
>     super(type);
>   }
>
>   /**
>    * @see
org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.renderkit.core.xhtml.DocumentRendere
r#encodeAll(javax.faces.context.FacesContext,
> org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.context.RenderingContext,
> javax.faces.component.UIComponent,
> org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.bean.FacesBean)
>    */
>   @Override
>   protected void encodeAll(FacesContext context, RenderingContext arc,
>     UIComponent component, FacesBean bean) throws IOException
>   {
>     if (Agent.AGENT_IE.equals(arc.getAgent().getAgentName()))
>     {
>       context.getResponseWriter().write("<!-- force quirks mode -->");
>     }
>     super.encodeAll(context, arc, component, bean);
>   }
> }
>
>
> On 8/23/07, Perkins, Nate-P63196 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I put a lot of time into this problem, albeit a while ago, but I
could not
> > find a way to satisfy my requirements for IE6 in standard mode, I
would love
> > to be able to, but I have not found a way.  I'll post the general
structure
> > and the css and perhaps you can help?
> >
> > The basic structure is this:
> >
> > <div id="top_bar">
> >     <span>Some necessary banner text</span>
> > </div>
> > <div id="main_content">
> >     Whatever the particular page requires
> > </div>
> > <div id="bottom_bar">
> >     <span>Again, some necessary banner text</span>
> > </div>
> >
> > The requirement is that the top_bar and the bottom_bar are always
visible
> > and in the same position (at the top and the bottom, respectively :)
) but
> > not covering the main_content while main_content can scroll as
necessary.
> >
> > Here's the css that I used to accomplish this, this works properly
in
> > Firefox regardless of the doc-type, but again, in IE6 it only works
in
> > quirks mode.
> >
> > body {
> > border: 0pt none;
> > margin: 0;
> > padding 0;
> >
> > height: 100%;
> > max-height: 100%;
> >
> > width: 100%;
> > max-width: 100%;
> > overflow: hidden;
> > }
> >
> > * html body {
> > padding: 5px 0pt 55px;
> > }
> >
> > #main_content {
> > bottom: 30px;
> > left: 0px;
> > overflow: auto;
> > position: fixed;
> > right: 0;
> > top: 25px;
> > }
> >
> > * html #main_content {
> > height: 100%;
> > position: relative;
> > width: 100%;
> > }
> >
> > #top_bar {
> > height: 25px;
> >
> > position: absolute;left: 0;
> > top: 0;
> > width: 100%;
> > }
> >
> > #bottom_bar {
> >
> > height: 25px;
> >
> > position: absolute;left: 0;
> > bottom: 0;
> > width: 100%;
> > }
> >
> >
> > Nate Perkins
> > 480-441-3667
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may
> > contain GDC4S
> >  confidential or privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use,
> > disclosure or distribution
> >  is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact
the
> > sender by reply email and
> >  destroy all copies of the original message.
> >
> >
> >  ________________________________
> >  From: Simon Lessard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 8:21 AM
> >
> > To: MyFaces Discussion
> > Subject: Re: [Trinidad] Upgrading to 1.0.2
> >
> >
> > Hello Nate,
> >
> > So what you're saying is that your application will only ever work
in quirk
> > mode? There's always a solution in standard mode as well, sometimes
a bit
> > more complicated though.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > ~ Simon
> >
> >
> > On 8/23/07, Perkins, Nate-P63196 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I commented out the jsp:output and that fixed the problem.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately I can not live with that solution as it is mandatory
for
> > > my project's pages.  We have a requirement for a fixed bar on top
and on
> > > bottom that do not scroll (while the rest of page obviously does)
and
> > > are always visible and the only solution I found required that
doc-type.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Nate Perkins
> > > 480-441-3667
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > >This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and
> > > may contain GDC4S
> > > > confidential or privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use,
> > > disclosure or distribution
> > > > is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please
contact
> > > the sender by reply email and
> > > > destroy all copies of the original message.
> > > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Adam Winer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 10:57 PM
> > > To: MyFaces Discussion
> > > Subject: Re: [Trinidad] Upgrading to 1.0.2
> > >
> > > If you remove the doctype-root-element, doctype-system,
> > > and doctype-public off of jsp:output, does the problem
> > > go away?  It looks as though that doctype is getting
> > > pushed straight into the content stream.  There's code
> > > in Trinidad to trim out the doctype (XmlHttpServletResponse
> > > and XmlOutput) during an XMLHttp request - don't know
> > > why it's not functioning here.
> > >
> > > -- Adam
> > >
> > >
> > > On 8/22/07, Perkins, Nate-P63196 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Ok,
> > > >
> > > > Here's the simplest example I could muster, this results in the
same
> > > > problem.  I am deploying to JBoss-4.0.5 using Trinidad 1.0.2 and
using
> > > > the RI 1.1
> > > >
> > > > Test.jspx:
> > > >
> > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> > > > <jsp:root
> > > >         xmlns:jsp="http://java.sun.com/JSP/Page";
> > > >         version="2.0"
> > > >         xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core "
> > > >
> > xmlns:trh="http://myfaces.apache.org/trinidad/html";
> > > >         xmlns:tr="http://myfaces.apache.org/trinidad "
> > > >         xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html";>
> > > >         <f:view>
> > > >                 <trh:html>
> > > >                 <jsp:output
> > > >                         omit-xml-declaration="false"
> > > >                         doctype-root-element="html"
> > > >
> > > > doctype-system="
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";
> > > >                         doctype-public="-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0
> > > > Strict//EN" />
> > > >                 <jsp:scriptlet>
> > > >         response.addHeader("pragma", "no-store,no-cache");
> > > >         response.setHeader("cache-control", "no-cache, no-store,
must
> > > > re-validate,max-age=-1");
> > > >         response.addHeader ("cache-control", "pre-check=0,
> > > > post-check=0");
> > > >         response.setDateHeader("expires", 0);
> > > >       </jsp:scriptlet>
> > > >                 <jsp:directive.page
> > > > contentType="text/html;charset=UTF-8" />
> > > >                 <trh:head title="Trinidad 1.0.2 PPR Test">
> > > >                         <meta
> > > >
> > http-equiv="Content-Type"
> > > >                                 content="text/html;
> > charset=UTF-8" />
> > > >                         <t:stylesheet
> > > > path="#{NMSPanelPageUtil.cssLocation}" />
> > > >                 </trh:head>
> > > >                 <trh:body>
> > > >                         <tr:form id="theForm">
> > > >                                 <tr:panelPage>
> > > >                                         <!--<jsp:
> > directive.include
> > > > file="/menu.jspx" />-->
> > > >                                         <tr:panelHeader
> > text="Partial
> > > > Submit Test">
> > > >
> > <tr:inputText
> > > >
> > id="input"
> > > >
> > > > value="#{testBB.input}"
> > > >
> > label="Input:"
> > > >
> > > > partialTriggers="partialTestButton" />
> > > >
> > <tr:commandButton
> > > >
> > > > id="partialTestButton"
> > > >
> > text="PPR
> > > Test"
> > > >
> > > > action="#{testBB.action}"
> > > >
> > > > partialSubmit="true" />
> > > >
> > <tr:outputText
> > > >
> > > > id="partialOutput"
> > > >
> > > > value="#{testBB.output}"
> > > >
> > > > partialTriggers="partialTestButton" />
> > > >
> > <tr:commandButton
> > > >
> > > > id="fullTestButton"
> > > >
> > text="Full
> > > > Submission Test"
> > > >
> > > > action="#{testBB.action}"/>
> > > >
> > <tr:outputText
> > > >
> > > id="fullOutput"
> > > >
> > > > value="#{testBB.output}"/>
> > > >
> > </tr:panelHeader>
> > > >                                 </tr:panelPage>
> > > >                         </tr:form>
> > > >                 </trh:body>
> > > >                 </trh:html>
> > > >         </f:view>
> > > > </jsp:root>
> > > >
> > > > Backing Bean:
> > > > import
> > org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.context.RequestContext;
> > > >
> > > > public class TestBb
> > > > {
> > > >    private RequestContext rc =
> > RequestContext.getCurrentInstance();
> > > >
> > > >    public TestBb()
> > > >    {
> > > >       setOutput("output");
> > > >       setInput("input");
> > > >    }
> > > >
> > > >    public void action()
> > > >    {
> > > >       setOutput(getInput());
> > > >    }
> > > >
> > > >    public String getOutput()
> > > >    {
> > > >       return (String) rc.getPageFlowScope().get("output");
> > > >    }
> > > >
> > > >    public void setOutput(String output)
> > > >    {
> > > >       rc.getPageFlowScope().put("output", output);
> > > >    }
> > > >
> > > >    public String getInput()
> > > >    {
> > > >       return (String) rc.getPageFlowScope().get("input");
> > > >    }
> > > >
> > > >    public void setInput(String input)
> > > >    {
> > > >       rc.getPageFlowScope().put("input", input);
> > > >    }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Nate Perkins
> > > > 480-441-3667
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > > >This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s)
> > > and
> > > > may contain GDC4S
> > > > > confidential or privileged information. Any unauthorized
review,
> > > use,
> > > > disclosure or distribution
> > > > > is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please
contact
> > > > the sender by reply email and
> > > > > destroy all copies of the original message.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Adam Winer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 1:35 PM
> > > > To: MyFaces Discussion
> > > > Subject: Re: [Trinidad] Upgrading to 1.0.2
> > > >
> > > > On 8/22/07, Perkins, Nate-P63196 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm testing my project with 1.0.2 and I am having several
issues.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. No PPR activity works, I get a javascript error "Invalid
PPR
> > > > response"
> > > > > any time I try to submit a PPR action
> > > >
> > > > PPR's been overhauled.  But also tested quite a lot.  I could
> > > > really use a testcase.
> > > >
> > > > > Can anyone give me a clue as to what's wrong and how to fix
it?
> > > >
> > > > Could you use Firebug and look at the responses you're getting
> > > > from the server?
> > > >
> > > > > 2. My skin no longer works, it seems that a few of the
selectors
> > > have
> > > > > changed, namely:
> > > > >         a) the panelHeader is rendering with
af_messages_header
> > > class
> > > > >         b) the panelBox has lost its background, it seems like
there
> > > > is no
> > > > > longer a distinction between panelBox transparent, light, etc.
> > > >
> > > > I think there was a fix just after 1.0.2 that affected panelBox,
and
> > > > perhaps panelHeader as well.  Deleting af:messages works around
> > > > it (with the obvious harm), or moving af:messages to the bottom
> > > > of the page.  It's fixed in the 1.0.3 nightlies.
> > > >
> > > > -- Adam
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I looked at the JIRA issues attached to the 1.0.2 release and
did
> > > not
> > > > see an
> > > > > obvious item that applied to either of these
discoveries....can
> > > anyone
> > > > verify
> > > > > exactly what it was that changed for each of these?
> > > > >
> > > > > Nate Perkins
> > > > > 480-441-3667
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > > This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s)
> > > > and may
> > > > > contain GDC4S
> > > > >  confidential or privileged information. Any unauthorized
review,
> > > use,
> > > > > disclosure or distribution
> > > > >  is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please
contact
> > > > the
> > > > > sender by reply email and
> > > > >  destroy all copies of the original message.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to