Can this be expected in 1.0.3?
Nate Perkins 480-441-3667 [EMAIL PROTECTED] >This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain GDC4S > confidential or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution > is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and > destroy all copies of the original message. > -----Original Message----- From: Adam Winer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 8:00 PM To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: Re: [Trinidad] Upgrading to 1.0.2 I'm getting the feeling that we really need to add a flag to at least trh:html or both trh:html and tr:document that supports forcing quirks mode. Thoughts? -- Adam On 8/23/07, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You can use IE6 in quirks mode and firefox in standards mode by > subclassing the tr:document renderer. > > If a comment appears before the doc type, IE will not go into standards mode. > > Here is some code if you want to do it this way to force only IE into > quirks mode while using tr:document: > > public class DocumentRenderer > extends > org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.renderkit.core.xhtml.DocumentRendere r > { > > /** > * > */ > public DocumentRenderer() > {} > > /** > * @param type > */ > public DocumentRenderer(Type type) > { > super(type); > } > > /** > * @see org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.renderkit.core.xhtml.DocumentRendere r#encodeAll(javax.faces.context.FacesContext, > org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.context.RenderingContext, > javax.faces.component.UIComponent, > org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.bean.FacesBean) > */ > @Override > protected void encodeAll(FacesContext context, RenderingContext arc, > UIComponent component, FacesBean bean) throws IOException > { > if (Agent.AGENT_IE.equals(arc.getAgent().getAgentName())) > { > context.getResponseWriter().write("<!-- force quirks mode -->"); > } > super.encodeAll(context, arc, component, bean); > } > } > > > On 8/23/07, Perkins, Nate-P63196 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I put a lot of time into this problem, albeit a while ago, but I could not > > find a way to satisfy my requirements for IE6 in standard mode, I would love > > to be able to, but I have not found a way. I'll post the general structure > > and the css and perhaps you can help? > > > > The basic structure is this: > > > > <div id="top_bar"> > > <span>Some necessary banner text</span> > > </div> > > <div id="main_content"> > > Whatever the particular page requires > > </div> > > <div id="bottom_bar"> > > <span>Again, some necessary banner text</span> > > </div> > > > > The requirement is that the top_bar and the bottom_bar are always visible > > and in the same position (at the top and the bottom, respectively :) ) but > > not covering the main_content while main_content can scroll as necessary. > > > > Here's the css that I used to accomplish this, this works properly in > > Firefox regardless of the doc-type, but again, in IE6 it only works in > > quirks mode. > > > > body { > > border: 0pt none; > > margin: 0; > > padding 0; > > > > height: 100%; > > max-height: 100%; > > > > width: 100%; > > max-width: 100%; > > overflow: hidden; > > } > > > > * html body { > > padding: 5px 0pt 55px; > > } > > > > #main_content { > > bottom: 30px; > > left: 0px; > > overflow: auto; > > position: fixed; > > right: 0; > > top: 25px; > > } > > > > * html #main_content { > > height: 100%; > > position: relative; > > width: 100%; > > } > > > > #top_bar { > > height: 25px; > > > > position: absolute;left: 0; > > top: 0; > > width: 100%; > > } > > > > #bottom_bar { > > > > height: 25px; > > > > position: absolute;left: 0; > > bottom: 0; > > width: 100%; > > } > > > > > > Nate Perkins > > 480-441-3667 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may > > contain GDC4S > > confidential or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, > > disclosure or distribution > > is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the > > sender by reply email and > > destroy all copies of the original message. > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Simon Lessard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 8:21 AM > > > > To: MyFaces Discussion > > Subject: Re: [Trinidad] Upgrading to 1.0.2 > > > > > > Hello Nate, > > > > So what you're saying is that your application will only ever work in quirk > > mode? There's always a solution in standard mode as well, sometimes a bit > > more complicated though. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > ~ Simon > > > > > > On 8/23/07, Perkins, Nate-P63196 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I commented out the jsp:output and that fixed the problem. > > > > > > Unfortunately I can not live with that solution as it is mandatory for > > > my project's pages. We have a requirement for a fixed bar on top and on > > > bottom that do not scroll (while the rest of page obviously does) and > > > are always visible and the only solution I found required that doc-type. > > > > > > > > > > > > Nate Perkins > > > 480-441-3667 > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > >This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and > > > may contain GDC4S > > > > confidential or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, > > > disclosure or distribution > > > > is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact > > > the sender by reply email and > > > > destroy all copies of the original message. > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Adam Winer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 10:57 PM > > > To: MyFaces Discussion > > > Subject: Re: [Trinidad] Upgrading to 1.0.2 > > > > > > If you remove the doctype-root-element, doctype-system, > > > and doctype-public off of jsp:output, does the problem > > > go away? It looks as though that doctype is getting > > > pushed straight into the content stream. There's code > > > in Trinidad to trim out the doctype (XmlHttpServletResponse > > > and XmlOutput) during an XMLHttp request - don't know > > > why it's not functioning here. > > > > > > -- Adam > > > > > > > > > On 8/22/07, Perkins, Nate-P63196 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Ok, > > > > > > > > Here's the simplest example I could muster, this results in the same > > > > problem. I am deploying to JBoss-4.0.5 using Trinidad 1.0.2 and using > > > > the RI 1.1 > > > > > > > > Test.jspx: > > > > > > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > > > > <jsp:root > > > > xmlns:jsp="http://java.sun.com/JSP/Page" > > > > version="2.0" > > > > xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core " > > > > > > xmlns:trh="http://myfaces.apache.org/trinidad/html" > > > > xmlns:tr="http://myfaces.apache.org/trinidad " > > > > xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html"> > > > > <f:view> > > > > <trh:html> > > > > <jsp:output > > > > omit-xml-declaration="false" > > > > doctype-root-element="html" > > > > > > > > doctype-system=" > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd" > > > > doctype-public="-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 > > > > Strict//EN" /> > > > > <jsp:scriptlet> > > > > response.addHeader("pragma", "no-store,no-cache"); > > > > response.setHeader("cache-control", "no-cache, no-store, must > > > > re-validate,max-age=-1"); > > > > response.addHeader ("cache-control", "pre-check=0, > > > > post-check=0"); > > > > response.setDateHeader("expires", 0); > > > > </jsp:scriptlet> > > > > <jsp:directive.page > > > > contentType="text/html;charset=UTF-8" /> > > > > <trh:head title="Trinidad 1.0.2 PPR Test"> > > > > <meta > > > > > > http-equiv="Content-Type" > > > > content="text/html; > > charset=UTF-8" /> > > > > <t:stylesheet > > > > path="#{NMSPanelPageUtil.cssLocation}" /> > > > > </trh:head> > > > > <trh:body> > > > > <tr:form id="theForm"> > > > > <tr:panelPage> > > > > <!--<jsp: > > directive.include > > > > file="/menu.jspx" />--> > > > > <tr:panelHeader > > text="Partial > > > > Submit Test"> > > > > > > <tr:inputText > > > > > > id="input" > > > > > > > > value="#{testBB.input}" > > > > > > label="Input:" > > > > > > > > partialTriggers="partialTestButton" /> > > > > > > <tr:commandButton > > > > > > > > id="partialTestButton" > > > > > > text="PPR > > > Test" > > > > > > > > action="#{testBB.action}" > > > > > > > > partialSubmit="true" /> > > > > > > <tr:outputText > > > > > > > > id="partialOutput" > > > > > > > > value="#{testBB.output}" > > > > > > > > partialTriggers="partialTestButton" /> > > > > > > <tr:commandButton > > > > > > > > id="fullTestButton" > > > > > > text="Full > > > > Submission Test" > > > > > > > > action="#{testBB.action}"/> > > > > > > <tr:outputText > > > > > > > id="fullOutput" > > > > > > > > value="#{testBB.output}"/> > > > > > > </tr:panelHeader> > > > > </tr:panelPage> > > > > </tr:form> > > > > </trh:body> > > > > </trh:html> > > > > </f:view> > > > > </jsp:root> > > > > > > > > Backing Bean: > > > > import > > org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.context.RequestContext; > > > > > > > > public class TestBb > > > > { > > > > private RequestContext rc = > > RequestContext.getCurrentInstance(); > > > > > > > > public TestBb() > > > > { > > > > setOutput("output"); > > > > setInput("input"); > > > > } > > > > > > > > public void action() > > > > { > > > > setOutput(getInput()); > > > > } > > > > > > > > public String getOutput() > > > > { > > > > return (String) rc.getPageFlowScope().get("output"); > > > > } > > > > > > > > public void setOutput(String output) > > > > { > > > > rc.getPageFlowScope().put("output", output); > > > > } > > > > > > > > public String getInput() > > > > { > > > > return (String) rc.getPageFlowScope().get("input"); > > > > } > > > > > > > > public void setInput(String input) > > > > { > > > > rc.getPageFlowScope().put("input", input); > > > > } > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > Nate Perkins > > > > 480-441-3667 > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > >This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) > > > and > > > > may contain GDC4S > > > > > confidential or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, > > > use, > > > > disclosure or distribution > > > > > is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact > > > > the sender by reply email and > > > > > destroy all copies of the original message. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Adam Winer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 1:35 PM > > > > To: MyFaces Discussion > > > > Subject: Re: [Trinidad] Upgrading to 1.0.2 > > > > > > > > On 8/22/07, Perkins, Nate-P63196 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I'm testing my project with 1.0.2 and I am having several issues. > > > > > > > > > > 1. No PPR activity works, I get a javascript error "Invalid PPR > > > > response" > > > > > any time I try to submit a PPR action > > > > > > > > PPR's been overhauled. But also tested quite a lot. I could > > > > really use a testcase. > > > > > > > > > Can anyone give me a clue as to what's wrong and how to fix it? > > > > > > > > Could you use Firebug and look at the responses you're getting > > > > from the server? > > > > > > > > > 2. My skin no longer works, it seems that a few of the selectors > > > have > > > > > changed, namely: > > > > > a) the panelHeader is rendering with af_messages_header > > > class > > > > > b) the panelBox has lost its background, it seems like there > > > > is no > > > > > longer a distinction between panelBox transparent, light, etc. > > > > > > > > I think there was a fix just after 1.0.2 that affected panelBox, and > > > > perhaps panelHeader as well. Deleting af:messages works around > > > > it (with the obvious harm), or moving af:messages to the bottom > > > > of the page. It's fixed in the 1.0.3 nightlies. > > > > > > > > -- Adam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I looked at the JIRA issues attached to the 1.0.2 release and did > > > not > > > > see an > > > > > obvious item that applied to either of these discoveries....can > > > anyone > > > > verify > > > > > exactly what it was that changed for each of these? > > > > > > > > > > Nate Perkins > > > > > 480-441-3667 > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) > > > > and may > > > > > contain GDC4S > > > > > confidential or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, > > > use, > > > > > disclosure or distribution > > > > > is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact > > > > the > > > > > sender by reply email and > > > > > destroy all copies of the original message. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

