Hi, I know all the "issues" with not able to use IE w/ activated ActiveX. Sure, a solution is possible, but it is (as always) a matter of time.
Are you willing to help out on this? I'll also check our internal requirements, since we have also customers, that may "upgrade" to Trinidad, coming from ADF Faces 10.x. Can you file an issue in our jira w/ some details, that we don't forget it? Thx, Matthias On Nov 28, 2007 1:38 PM, Goerss, Jan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The problem is that our customers are banking houses. > They define the security constrains (IE5.5+ with deactivated ActiveX). > > We use Trinidad 1.2.1 and we can't switch to latest version of Trinidad with > AJAX. > > I hope, a fallback option is possible, otherwise we can't use the latest > version of Trinidad and our project can work with Trinidad version 1.2.1 only. > The problems are with this constrain: > - we get no bugfixing more > - we can't use new components and features (new releases) > - we can't use new trinidad development > > > I hope a solution is possible. > > Thanks, > > Jan > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Matthias > Wessendorf > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. November 2007 11:04 > An: MyFaces Discussion > Betreff: Re: Trinidad Ajax > > > Hi Jan, > > yes, we switched to XHR with the release of 1.0.2 (and 1.2.2). > There is no way to use IFrame instead of XHR. > > This will remain, because Ajax is pretty common these days and > other JSF-libs have that as well. > > Providing an option to "fallback" might be possible, but not sure if that > will be done. > > Is "IE 5.5" really still supported by M$? > If not, I'd strongly recommend to kick that guy out. > Sure... only the IE7 doesn't require ActiveX for XHR, but IE does. > > I am not aware of a solution for that. > > Do you have any ideas ? > > -Matthias > > On Nov 28, 2007 10:48 AM, Goerss, Jan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > we noticed that MyFaces Trinidad is changing the PPR mechanism towards real > > AJAX and the XmlHttpRequest object. > > > > > > > > We are using Trinidad is the finance sector. There it is normal that the > > clients use the Internet Explorer with deactivated ActiveX. > > > > Furthermore they use not the newest browsers, so we although need to support > > at least IE 5.5+. > > > > > > > > At the beginning of our project we decide to take Trinidad because of it's > > IFrame-PPR solution. > > > > > > > > It seems as if it is not possible to choose between the two modes: PPR or > > AJAX. > > > > > > > > Will this remain? If so why? Otherwise, we think that a lot of Trinidad > > library users will encounter problems with their clientsJ > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Jan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > further stuff: > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
