Hi Wolfgang, This page talks about conversation names: http://myfaces.apache.org/orchestra/myfaces-orchestra-core/conversation.html
However there isn't an actual code example on that page; I will try to find time to add one. An example of a conversation name is shown here: http://myfaces.apache.org/orchestra/myfaces-orchestra-core/usage.html Regards, Simon ---- Wolfgang Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Thanks for the answer. > I have tried to define a name for my conversation but did not succeed. All > I found in the documentation was the hint of some hidden id on page specs. > > "Orchestra also provides the concept of a "conversation context", which > holds a set of named conversations. A "separateConversationContext" JSF > component creates a new context. When this is a parent of any command > component (eg a commandLink) then a new conversation context is > automatically created when that command is executed. This allows multiple > windows to access the same site while having completely independent sets of > objects that are of "conversation scope". A hidden "id" emitted into pages > specifies what the current conversation context is, ensuring the new > windows "sticks" with its associated conversation context." > > Can you please describe how I can define names for my conversations and how > to force my beans to use a spezially named conversation ? > > THX > AG WW > > > > > > simon > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > hello.at> To > MyFaces Discussion > 06.02.2008 08:16 <[email protected]> > cc > > Please respond to Subject > "MyFaces Re: How can I have more than one > Discussion" bean in an orchestra conversation > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ache.org> > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 00:54 +0100, Wolfgang Wagner wrote: > > > > In my application context i have defined multiple beans with > > scope="conversation.manual" > > When calling Conversation.getCurrentInstance().invalidate() in an action > > method of one of these beans only that bean gets destroyed. > > > > It seems as if there is one conversation object for each of my > conversation > > scoped beans. > > I have expected that newly created beans that are are under conversation > > scope join automatically an already running conversation, and get > destroyed > > whenever the conversation gets destroyed. > > > > > > Is there a way to have multiple objects in one conversation ?? > > Yep. Each conversation has a *name*. If you do not specify a name for a > conversation, then conversationName=beanName. > > If two beans are assigned to a conversation with the same name, then > invalidating that conversation invalidates both beans. > > Regards, Simon > > >
