Hi On Feb 6, 2008 3:01 PM, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, > > This page talks about conversation names: > http://myfaces.apache.org/orchestra/myfaces-orchestra-core/conversation.html > > However there isn't an actual code example on that page; I will try to find > time to add one. > > An example of a conversation name is shown here: > http://myfaces.apache.org/orchestra/myfaces-orchestra-core/usage.html
I know, i am lazy when it comes to nail down documentation as well. Perhaps worth to start a "Orchestra FAQ" wiki page ? Maybe Wolfgang could just contribute some bits ? :) -M > > Regards, > Simon > > ---- Wolfgang Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > Thanks for the answer. > > I have tried to define a name for my conversation but did not succeed. All > > I found in the documentation was the hint of some hidden id on page specs. > > > > "Orchestra also provides the concept of a "conversation context", which > > holds a set of named conversations. A "separateConversationContext" JSF > > component creates a new context. When this is a parent of any command > > component (eg a commandLink) then a new conversation context is > > automatically created when that command is executed. This allows multiple > > windows to access the same site while having completely independent sets of > > objects that are of "conversation scope". A hidden "id" emitted into pages > > specifies what the current conversation context is, ensuring the new > > windows "sticks" with its associated conversation context." > > > > Can you please describe how I can define names for my conversations and how > > to force my beans to use a spezially named conversation ? > > > > THX > > AG WW > > > > > > > > > > > > simon > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > hello.at> To > > MyFaces Discussion > > 06.02.2008 08:16 <[email protected]> > > cc > > > > > Please respond to Subject > > "MyFaces Re: How can I have more than one > > Discussion" bean in an orchestra conversation > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ache.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 00:54 +0100, Wolfgang Wagner wrote: > > > > > > In my application context i have defined multiple beans with > > > scope="conversation.manual" > > > When calling Conversation.getCurrentInstance().invalidate() in an action > > > method of one of these beans only that bean gets destroyed. > > > > > > It seems as if there is one conversation object for each of my > > conversation > > > scoped beans. > > > I have expected that newly created beans that are are under conversation > > > scope join automatically an already running conversation, and get > > destroyed > > > whenever the conversation gets destroyed. > > > > > > > > > Is there a way to have multiple objects in one conversation ?? > > > > Yep. Each conversation has a *name*. If you do not specify a name for a > > conversation, then conversationName=beanName. > > > > If two beans are assigned to a conversation with the same name, then > > invalidating that conversation invalidates both beans. > > > > Regards, Simon > > > > > > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
