Re: Doubt about ADF Faces & Trinidad

[Frank Nimphius]

No, ADF Faces doesn't force you to licence OracleAs. The opposite is true. If you have an OracleAs licence then there is no ADF Faces licence fee to pay Frank Simon Lessard wrote: Hello Aaron Another addition. If you use ADF Faces, I think Oracle license forces you to use OracleAS so if you want to deploy on a different application server, I suggest that you go with Trinidad. Also, depending on the release date of your project, Trinidad might be the best choice nonetheless since JDeveloper 11 uses Trinidad and not the old ADF Faces. Regards, ~ Simon On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Frank Nimphius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In addition .. using Trinidad without ADF works in JDeveloper 10g as well. If you use your own model binding then accessing ADF BC also becomes possible Frank Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Trinidad is the Apache 2.0 licensed stuff. ADF Faces is licensed by Oracle. in jdev 10g there are some issues, when you are trying to use Trinidad with things like ADFm. in jdev 11g trinidad will be used for ADF Faces 10g migrations, so next to ADF Faces Rich Client, Trinidad is supported in JDev 11g -Matthias On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Aaron Santiago Dulce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Greetings to everyone, We are starting to develop our web applications with ADF Faces, but we want to know if the apache 2.0 license apply to ADF Faces or we need to switch to Trinidad. Also, if we are working with JDeveloper, if as simply as changing the lib's to the Trinidad. Thanks a lot in advance. Aaron Santiago Ideas Ltd. Project Manager -- ________________________________ Frank Nimphius Principal Product Manager Application Development Tools Oracle Corporation mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone:+49 2058 782481 -- ________________________________ Frank Nimphius Principal Product Manager Application Development Tools Oracle Corporation mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone:+49 2058 782481