While I've been doing my own thing for about 18 years, and not really
having much to say about my observations of what others are doing, I have
been looking on from a comfortable distance. Recently months observing a
lack of general activity on this news list might forebode something
stranger than a lack of interest in correcting what could be a
future problem with the NB profiler. If anyone can hear me now: I'm still
here, and working on my problems - one's that I think AI isn't able to
reach yet.

Happy to hear back from someone. :)


On Sat, 22 Aug 2026 at 23:12, Owen Thomas <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Eughhh... Editing fluff left bad grammar. Let me correct...
>
> On Sat, 22 Aug 2026 at 23:04, Owen Thomas <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello fellow NB users.
>>
>> I have recently taken to the profiler supplied with my NB 28, and I'm
>> getting the following set of warning messages appear in my applications'
>> system console output:
>>
>> WARNING: A Java agent has been loaded dynamically
>> (/usr/lib/apache-netbeans/profiler/lib/jfluid-server-15.jar)
>> WARNING: If a serviceability tool is in use, please run with
>> -XX:+EnableDynamicAgentLoading to hide this warning
>> WARNING: If a serviceability tool is not in use, please run with
>> -Djdk.instrument.traceUsage for more information
>>
>> *WARNING: Dynamic loading of agents will be disallowed by default in a
>> future release*WARNING: A restricted method in java.lang.System has been
>> called
>> WARNING: java.lang.System::load has been called by
>> org.netbeans.lib.profiler.server.ProfilerServer in an unnamed module
>> WARNING: Use --enable-native-access=ALL-UNNAMED to avoid a warning for
>> callers in this module
>>
>>
>> *WARNING: Restricted methods will be blocked in a future release unless
>> native access is enabled*
>> The lines in bold font are my emphasis, for these lines in particular,
>> make me concerned that I will find that the profiler does not work in a
>> later version of the IDE.
>>
>> So, my questions are: Has this issue been addressed in a later version?
>> If so, which one? If not, is this issue likely to be addressed soon?
>>
>> TFYH.
>>
>>   Owen.
>>
>

Reply via email to