On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Adam Lamar <adamond...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Russell,
>
> Sorry - I meant that I use the FetchS3Object processor, not ListS3.

Ah, that makes more sense, thanks.

> You can
> set the Object Key property with the name of the key you want to download.
> This property supports the expression language, so the object key can be
> sourced from each flowfile.
>
> I'm unsure if there is a good template around, but I'd be willing to share
> my flow if that would be helpful.
>

That would be enormously useful, yes, thanks, please.

Russell

> Cheers,
> Adam
>
>
> On 1/12/16 8:14 PM, Russell Whitaker wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Adam Lamar <adamond...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 1/12/16 8:04 PM, Bryan Bende wrote:
>>>>
>>>> In the case of FetchS3, there is definitely intent to have a ListS3, but
>>>> there are still ways to use it with out that...
>>>
>>>
>>> To add to Bryan's comment, I use ListS3 in combination with GetSQS to
>>> fetch
>>> objects as they are newly placed into an s3 bucket. For my use case, it
>>> works great.
>>>
>> What "ListS3"? There's no ListS3* processor in the v0.4.1 distribution I
>> have.
>>
>> R
>>
>>> There is also more discussion here:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-25 . In particular, see Mark
>>> Payne's first comment. It sounds like the problem isn't so much
>>> implementing
>>> the functionality, but some of the semantics around exactly what a ListS3
>>> processor should do.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Adam
>
>



-- 
Russell Whitaker
http://twitter.com/OrthoNormalRuss
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/russell-whitaker/0/b86/329

Reply via email to