Keep an eye out for any "out of memory" errors in your NCMs nifi-app.log.
On Mar 4, 2016 1:51 AM, "Conrad Crampton" <conrad.cramp...@secdata.com>
wrote:

> Mark, Matt
> Thanks for the greater understanding about what is happening beneath the
> covers – always useful.
> Conrad
>
> From: Mark Payne <marka...@hotmail.com>
> Reply-To: "users@nifi.apache.org" <users@nifi.apache.org>
> Date: Thursday, 3 March 2016 at 19:00
> To: "users@nifi.apache.org" <users@nifi.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: UI performance slow
>
> Conrad,
>
> Just to provide a bit of clarification, when Matt says "You can enable
> additional logging on the NCM", this is done by
> adding the following to your $NIFI_HOME/conf/logback.xml on the NCM:
>
> <logger name="org.apache.nifi.cluster.manager.impl.
> HttpRequestReplicatorImpl" level="DEBUG" />
>
> Thanks
> -Mark
>
>
> On Mar 3, 2016, at 1:26 PM, Matt Gilman <matt.c.gil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Conrad,
>
> That spinner icon appears anytime there is an outstanding HTTP request. In
> clustered mode, that request is received by the NCM and then replicated to
> each node. Once each node has responded a response is returned to the user.
> The requests in your case could have been slowed by a number factors.
> Obviously, the response to the user will only be as fast as the response
> from the slowest node. Additionally, if the request was mutable (would
> change the flow) it could have been slowed by other requests.
>
> If you continue seeing issues, you can enable additional logging on the
> NCM and each node to print the response times and identify where exactly
> things are sluggish.
>
> Matt
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Conrad Crampton <
> conrad.cramp...@secdata.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>> Not using NAS mounts. Direct file system. The performance appears to have
>> improved (magically) with use – might be a javascript loading issue when I
>> first started it. Hopefully this was the cause and not something more
>> onerous.
>> Thanks for the suggestion – good to know in any case.
>> I’ll re-post in this thread if it comes back.
>> Regards
>> Conrad
>>
>> From: Jeremy Dyer <jdy...@gmail.com>
>> Reply-To: "users@nifi.apache.org" <users@nifi.apache.org>
>> Date: Thursday, 3 March 2016 at 11:54
>> To: "users@nifi.apache.org" <users@nifi.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: UI performance slow
>>
>> Conrad,
>>
>> I have seen this a few times before. NiFi has an internal actions H2
>> database where it stores each update made to the workflow. Usually when
>> this happens the culprit is the UI is waiting on this operation to
>> complete. You wouldn't happen to be using NAS mounts for your
>> "database_repository" would you?
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Mar 3, 2016, at 5:37 AM, Conrad Crampton <conrad.cramp...@secdata.com
>> <conrad.cramp...@secdata.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> I have just upgraded my 6 node cluster to 0.5.1 and am experiencing slow
>> performance in the UI.
>> I can’t necessarily attribute this to the upgrade because:
>>
>>    1. I didn’t use the cluster particularly very much as I was
>>    developing/ testing on my laptop, so I don’t know what performance was 
>> like
>>    before.
>>    2. I have increased the number of nodes in the cluster from 3 to 6
>>    (just because I introduced Ansible into the mix to ease deployment)
>>
>> The issues I am experiencing are simple things like dragging processors
>> around, opening up dialogs (template list etc.). When doing these actions,
>> I get the little spinning circle next to the ‘stats last refreshed’ time.
>> Causing the UI experience to be a bit unhelpful.
>>
>> Anyone suggest some things to check to improve this?
>>
>> I am using the default bootstrap.conf file without any changes (other
>> than run.as=)
>>
>> Thanks
>> Conrad
>>
>>
>> SecureData, combating cyber threats
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may
>> be privileged and confidential and intended for the exclusive use of the
>> intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient any disclosure,
>> reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this
>> communications is strictly prohibited. The views expressed in this email
>> are those of the individual and not necessarily of SecureData Europe Ltd.
>> Any prices quoted are only valid if followed up by a formal written quote.
>>
>> SecureData Europe Limited. Registered in England & Wales 04365896.
>> Registered Address: SecureData House, Hermitage Court, Hermitage Lane,
>> Maidstone, Kent, ME16 9NT
>>
>>
>>
>> ***This email originated outside SecureData***
>>
>> Click here
>> <https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/zraPR6eHOiDGX2PQPOmvUs3oG7lEfVxCxO4twiJ91PQGRmYoDUUj+7iBTIHiUs7clDZx+5TL0HMWkFyhp8LJ4g==>
>> to report this email as spam.
>>
>
>
>

Reply via email to