Hello While i am not aware of any strong reason to keep it the way it is there are no plans to change it at this time. Some project do this and some don't.
Thanks Joe On Jun 6, 2016 10:13 AM, "ski n" <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, I already have a soft link, but this was more a remark that the > directory structure is not in line with the Apache convention. > > 2016-06-06 13:12 GMT+02:00 Pat Trainor <[email protected]>: > > Why not use softlinks? > > > > ln -s <what you have> <link you want> > > > > ...as in: > > > > pat@wopr:~$ l /opt > > total 76 > > [...] > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 pat pat 10 May 30 18:08 nifi -> nifi-0.6.1 > > drwxrwxr-x 20 pat pat 4096 Jun 5 21:22 nifi-0.6.1 > > [...] > > > > Thanks! > > > > pat > > ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) > > "A wise man can learn more from a foolish question than a fool can learn > > from a wise answer". ~ Bruce Lee. > > > > On Jun 6 2016, at 3:53 am, ski n <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> NiFi is unpacked/installed by default in the directory: nifi-0.6.1 > >> > >> My other Apache installations all are grouped together by the Apache > >> "apache-" prefix. > >> > >> For example: apache-tomcat-7.0.69 > >> > >> Will this change in future releases (now NiFi is still before the 1.0 > >> release) >
