Nawaz,

Yes. The relationships array is read-only and reports the current state of
the relationship. There is a separate array called
autoTerminatedRelationships in the processor config.

{
  "config": {
    "autoTerminatedRelationships": ["success"]
  }
}

Let me know if you have any other questions. Thanks!

Matt

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Nawaz Akther -X (nakther - INSIGHT GLOBAL
INC at Cisco) <[email protected]> wrote:

> Matt,
>
>
>
> "relationships": [
>
>       {
>
>         "name": "success",
>
>         "description": "All created FlowFiles are routed to this
> relationship",
>
>         "autoTerminate": true
>
>       }
>
>     ],
>
>
>
>
>
> I have added this bit in the JSON. Even though I set the autoTerminate to
> true it stays false.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nawaz
>
>
>
> *From:* Matt Gilman [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 28, 2016 12:15 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: changing processor relationship via REST API
>
>
>
> Nawaz,
>
>
>
> Can you double check how you're attempting to set the relationship to
> auto-terminate? There is a flag which is part of the Relationship that is
> considered read-only and reports the current state of the relationship.
> However, to auto-terminate a connection you need to add it to the
> autoTerminatedRelationships array in the processor config. If you open up
> the Dev Tools in your browser you should be able to see it in action.
>
>
>
> Let me know if you have any other questions. Thanks!
>
>
>
> Matt
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Nawaz Akther -X (nakther - INSIGHT GLOBAL
> INC at Cisco) <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am trying to create an executeProcess processor via the REST API. And I
> am trying to set the relationship of success to be auto terminated. And for
> some reason if I include the autoTerminate as True in the JSON the
> processor is still created with the autoTerminate option as False. And I am
> trying to change it via a PUT call and it still remains false. Has onyone
> encountered this problem.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nawaz
>
>
>

Reply via email to